Résultats de recherche : shortcom

 
  •  
    1 min 14

    décor shortcom

    décor pour future shortcom, plus plus tard, village de sollies pont et cuers, pas loin de chez Julien

    darkang3l360x

     23
     1 an
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    6 min 50

    Noob_s04_prologue_(-olydri-studio-)

    Noob est une série d'épisodes courts diffusés sur le chaîne NOLIFE depuis le 7 novembre 2008. Il s'agit de la première série live française sur le thème des MMORPG !!!! http://noob-tv.com

    NoobTV

     141 705
     3 mois
     4
     
     
     
  •  
    2 min 55

    Episode 1 : Nouveau Bureau

    Bertier est heureux. Il vient d'avoir un bureau tout neuf. Serait-ce une promotion? Valérie n'est pas de cet avis... et elle le fait comprendre à son nouveau voisin. http://blog.drh-lesite.com http://www.drh-lesite.com

    DRH_Serie

     10 921
     3 ans
     11
     
     
     
  •  
    1 min 22

    Episode 11 : La démission

    On en a toujours tous rêver ! Cet employé l'a fait ! http://blog.drh-lesite.com http://www.drh-lesite.com

    DRH_Serie

     3 785
     3 ans
     4
     
     
     
  •  
    2 min 06

    Episode 13 : Zeu Private detective

    Un petit tour dans les rêves / fantasmes de Nicolas Bertier... http://blog.drh-lesite.com

    DRH_Serie

     1 586
     3 ans
     7
     
     
     
  •  
    49 sec

    Flannoob 01 - Girl Power

    Mini cross over entre deux shortcoms humoristique

    flanderscompany

     19 252
     2 ans
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    2 min 36

    Brigitte répond : épisode 5 : qui qui qui sont les snorkies ?

    Une fois de plus, Brigitte Répond ! retrouve là ici : http://www.justepourrire.com:80/channel/Brigitterepond Rejoins son groupe sur facebook ici : http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=21689840121 deviens fan ici : http://www.facebook.com/pages/Brigitte-Repond-/10411281381 Et ce sera tout simplement merveilleux !

    brigitte_coach

     365
     3 ans
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    3 min 10

    Teaser DRH Saison 2

    DRH le come-back ! Dès le 28 mai, tous les mercredis, Nicolas Bertier revient encore plus méchant, plus drole, plus pervers, plus décapant et plus violent ! Un petit trailer / making-of de l'avant tournage, des répétitions aux peintures des murs... Tout ça tourné au Pavillons Sauvages : www.olibanum.org et toutes les infos de DRH sur le blog : http://blog.drh-lesite.com. Et dès le 28 mai, le site officiel ! http://www.drh-lesite.com

    DRH_Serie

     1 617
     3 ans
     6
     
     
     
  •  
    2 min 55

    Episode 3 : Syndicaliste

    Nicolas Bertier est dérangé dans ses occupations par un syndicaliste en colère... http://blog.drh-lesite.com

    DRH_Serie

     6 370
     3 ans
     5
     
     
     
  •  
    2 min 08

    Episode 5 : La vengeance de la licenciée

    Par les producteurs de la licenciée 1, 2 et 3 ! Mlle Bli revient et ce coup-ci elle espère bien régler ses comptes ! http://blog.drh-lesite.com

    DRH_Serie

     6 824
     3 ans
     4
     
     
     
  •  
    2 min 13

    Episode 8 : Immigration choisie

    Nicolas Bertier revient de vacances mais un candidat fort en diplôme et en parcours vient le déranger pour un entretien... Franchement Nicolas, là tu crains ! http://blog.drh-lesite.com

    DRH_Serie

     3 227
     3 ans
     4
     
     
     
  •  
    1 min 22

    [Amapix]Teaser Staarwarss

    Staarwarss est une mini-série (ou shortcom) parodique de Star Wars en mélangeant son univers au style de la série Kaamelott. L'histoire prend place dans un univers étendu "fictif" (comprendre : "non-officiel") où un détachement de l'armée républicaine est posté sur Yavin IV afin de surveiller les éventuels restes d'activités impériales avec à sa tête un Jedi et un militaire qui n'aime pas les Jedi...

    Amapix

     130
     2 ans
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    4 min 57

    small shortcom

    à l'époque où mon collègue marco habitait toulon

    darkang3l360x

     27
     1 an
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    5 min 54

    Remember

    Musique realisés pour un projet de bande originale pour une web serie Noob est une shortcom française créée par Fabien Fournier et diffusée depuis 7 novembre 2008 sur la chaîne Nolife disponible sur les bouquets de télévision par ADSL français.

    BourrinOman

     14
     1 an
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    27 min 45

    The Great Global Warming Swindle 1 of 3

    The Great Global Warming Swindle http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/ https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html The Great Global Warming Swindle A DVD of the film, The Great Global Warming Swindle, will be available from mid July (despite the strenuous efforts of those who support the theory of global warming to prevent its release). The DVD is an expanded and improved version of the film broadcast in the UK on Channel Four. More interview material has been added, covering a broader range of subjects than was possible in the broadcast film. However, we urge those interested in hearing the case against the theory of man made global warming to dig deeper. The main purpose of this site is to point people towards key scientific papers, books and other relevant material. We have received literally thousands of emails from scientists and others expressing their support and encouragement. These emails are also often very useful, steering us towards new studies in different areas. Please keep sending them. The email address is: gw@wagtv.com The general reaction to the film has been overwhelming and enormously encouraging. As Channel Four reported in Broadcast magazine, they received a record number of phone calls following the first transmission. They calculated that the calls were 6 to 1 in support of the film. It would be nice to claim that the explosion of interest was due to the film itself, but the fuss started even before the film was broadcast. The reason, we suspect, is that the coverage of ‘global warming’, on TV, radio and in the press, has been so one-sided and uncritical. In Britain, hours and hours of programmes have been broadcast by the BBC on the subject, much of it scientifically absurd. The very fact that a science documentary dared to challenge the orthodoxy was itself news. Why? Why have journalists been so craven or biased? How has a theory which demonstrably lacks really solid supporting evidence become an indisputable fact? What of the impressive, much talked about scientific ‘consensus’ which is used to forestall any awkward questions about the evidence? The film made a humble stab at suggesting some possible answers, but there was limited space for these bigger questions. The whole global warming alarm, we believe, raises serious issues about the way science functions in the real world, about the political bias of scientists, about censorship within the scientific community itself, about the routine practice of scientists drawing false or inflated conclusions from ambiguous or uncertain data, about the manifest failure of the peer review process, about the extraordinary unwillingness of scientists who have invested time and reputation in a particular theory to consider evidence which directly contradicts it, about the elevation of speculation (models) to the level of solid data, and much else besides. Science and scientists cannot always rise above the prejudices of their class and of their age. The selection and handling of evidence often reflects these prejudices. The most highly qualified and respected scientists can be blind to obvious deficiencies in a theory, and will be dismissive of evidence when it undermines what they want to believe. But the scare over man made global warming may prove to be the first great example in the modern Western world, when science was betrayed by scientists themselves This web-site is still young, and the people running it are doing so in their spare time (when they really should be making television programmes). So apologies for its shortcomings. The makers of the documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle have made many science documentaries before. The thing they found most shocking when they started to make this one, was the weakness of the case for man made global warming, and the quantity and quality of the evidence which flatly contradicts it. Piers Corbyn of Weather Action http://www.youtube.com/user/1weatheraction Website: http://www.weatheraction.com About Me: Long Range Weather Forecast and Global Warming Denial. For longer ahead forecasts and consultancy on weather and climate forecasting please contact WeatherAction Office (piers@WeatherAction.com ) Support the pioneering work of WeatherAction by financial support of research. Supporters will be added to our information mailing list and will be kept informed of new developments on a regular basis (contribution amount optional).

    mirrorthis2010

     209
     1 an
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    26 min 04

    The Great Global Warming Swindle 2 of 3

    The Great Global Warming Swindle http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/ https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html The Great Global Warming Swindle A DVD of the film, The Great Global Warming Swindle, will be available from mid July (despite the strenuous efforts of those who support the theory of global warming to prevent its release). The DVD is an expanded and improved version of the film broadcast in the UK on Channel Four. More interview material has been added, covering a broader range of subjects than was possible in the broadcast film. However, we urge those interested in hearing the case against the theory of man made global warming to dig deeper. The main purpose of this site is to point people towards key scientific papers, books and other relevant material. We have received literally thousands of emails from scientists and others expressing their support and encouragement. These emails are also often very useful, steering us towards new studies in different areas. Please keep sending them. The email address is: gw@wagtv.com The general reaction to the film has been overwhelming and enormously encouraging. As Channel Four reported in Broadcast magazine, they received a record number of phone calls following the first transmission. They calculated that the calls were 6 to 1 in support of the film. It would be nice to claim that the explosion of interest was due to the film itself, but the fuss started even before the film was broadcast. The reason, we suspect, is that the coverage of ‘global warming’, on TV, radio and in the press, has been so one-sided and uncritical. In Britain, hours and hours of programmes have been broadcast by the BBC on the subject, much of it scientifically absurd. The very fact that a science documentary dared to challenge the orthodoxy was itself news. Why? Why have journalists been so craven or biased? How has a theory which demonstrably lacks really solid supporting evidence become an indisputable fact? What of the impressive, much talked about scientific ‘consensus’ which is used to forestall any awkward questions about the evidence? The film made a humble stab at suggesting some possible answers, but there was limited space for these bigger questions. The whole global warming alarm, we believe, raises serious issues about the way science functions in the real world, about the political bias of scientists, about censorship within the scientific community itself, about the routine practice of scientists drawing false or inflated conclusions from ambiguous or uncertain data, about the manifest failure of the peer review process, about the extraordinary unwillingness of scientists who have invested time and reputation in a particular theory to consider evidence which directly contradicts it, about the elevation of speculation (models) to the level of solid data, and much else besides. Science and scientists cannot always rise above the prejudices of their class and of their age. The selection and handling of evidence often reflects these prejudices. The most highly qualified and respected scientists can be blind to obvious deficiencies in a theory, and will be dismissive of evidence when it undermines what they want to believe. But the scare over man made global warming may prove to be the first great example in the modern Western world, when science was betrayed by scientists themselves This web-site is still young, and the people running it are doing so in their spare time (when they really should be making television programmes). So apologies for its shortcomings. The makers of the documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle have made many science documentaries before. The thing they found most shocking when they started to make this one, was the weakness of the case for man made global warming, and the quantity and quality of the evidence which flatly contradicts it. Piers Corbyn of Weather Action http://www.youtube.com/user/1weatheraction Website: http://www.weatheraction.com About Me: Long Range Weather Forecast and Global Warming Denial. For longer ahead forecasts and consultancy on weather and climate forecasting please contact WeatherAction Office (piers@WeatherAction.com ) Support the pioneering work of WeatherAction by financial support of research. Supporters will be added to our information mailing list and will be kept informed of new developments on a regular basis (contribution amount optional).

    mirrorthis2010

     82
     1 an
     0
     
     
     
  •  
    22 min 07

    The Great Global Warming Swindle 3 of 3

    The Great Global Warming Swindle http://www.greatglobalwarmingswindle.co.uk/ https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html The Great Global Warming Swindle A DVD of the film, The Great Global Warming Swindle, will be available from mid July (despite the strenuous efforts of those who support the theory of global warming to prevent its release). The DVD is an expanded and improved version of the film broadcast in the UK on Channel Four. More interview material has been added, covering a broader range of subjects than was possible in the broadcast film. However, we urge those interested in hearing the case against the theory of man made global warming to dig deeper. The main purpose of this site is to point people towards key scientific papers, books and other relevant material. We have received literally thousands of emails from scientists and others expressing their support and encouragement. These emails are also often very useful, steering us towards new studies in different areas. Please keep sending them. The email address is: gw@wagtv.com The general reaction to the film has been overwhelming and enormously encouraging. As Channel Four reported in Broadcast magazine, they received a record number of phone calls following the first transmission. They calculated that the calls were 6 to 1 in support of the film. It would be nice to claim that the explosion of interest was due to the film itself, but the fuss started even before the film was broadcast. The reason, we suspect, is that the coverage of ‘global warming’, on TV, radio and in the press, has been so one-sided and uncritical. In Britain, hours and hours of programmes have been broadcast by the BBC on the subject, much of it scientifically absurd. The very fact that a science documentary dared to challenge the orthodoxy was itself news. Why? Why have journalists been so craven or biased? How has a theory which demonstrably lacks really solid supporting evidence become an indisputable fact? What of the impressive, much talked about scientific ‘consensus’ which is used to forestall any awkward questions about the evidence? The film made a humble stab at suggesting some possible answers, but there was limited space for these bigger questions. The whole global warming alarm, we believe, raises serious issues about the way science functions in the real world, about the political bias of scientists, about censorship within the scientific community itself, about the routine practice of scientists drawing false or inflated conclusions from ambiguous or uncertain data, about the manifest failure of the peer review process, about the extraordinary unwillingness of scientists who have invested time and reputation in a particular theory to consider evidence which directly contradicts it, about the elevation of speculation (models) to the level of solid data, and much else besides. Science and scientists cannot always rise above the prejudices of their class and of their age. The selection and handling of evidence often reflects these prejudices. The most highly qualified and respected scientists can be blind to obvious deficiencies in a theory, and will be dismissive of evidence when it undermines what they want to believe. But the scare over man made global warming may prove to be the first great example in the modern Western world, when science was betrayed by scientists themselves This web-site is still young, and the people running it are doing so in their spare time (when they really should be making television programmes). So apologies for its shortcomings. The makers of the documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle have made many science documentaries before. The thing they found most shocking when they started to make this one, was the weakness of the case for man made global warming, and the quantity and quality of the evidence which flatly contradicts it. Piers Corbyn of Weather Action http://www.youtube.com/user/1weatheraction Website: http://www.weatheraction.com About Me: Long Range Weather Forecast and Global Warming Denial. For longer ahead forecasts and consultancy on weather and climate forecasting please contact WeatherAction Office (piers@WeatherAction.com ) Support the pioneering work of WeatherAction by financial support of research. Supporters will be added to our information mailing list and will be kept informed of new developments on a regular basis (contribution amount optional).

    mirrorthis2010

     34
     1 an
     0
     
     
     

 Précédent 1 Suivant 

 
 
 

Résultats de recherche : shortcom