Résultats de recherche : lead
-
1 min 10Treatment of man’s all sexual disorders
http://www.anandclinic.com Anand Clinic & Research Centre is the only and best institute of its kind in India to treat man’s sexual diseases. The institute is equipped with ultra modern and latest diagnostic facilities to treat man’s sexual diseases like Erectile dysfunction, Premature ejaculation, Spermatorrhea, Nightfall etc. Sexuality plays an important role in maintaining a happy life. Countless examples have proved that unhappy sexual relationship creates a bad consequence in family relations. Medical science has also justified that the stress of modern life, mental tension, unhealthy food habits and human body’s inherent physical condition may lead to disastrous sexual disorders. These conditions eventually lead people to sexual frigidity. The good news is that scientific and effective treatment for sexual diseases is now available through expert doctors in the field at Anand Clinic & Research Centre because respecting life begins with good sexual health care. Those who seek a happy sexual life will have to look for genuine experts who make accurate diagnosis and suggest effective and proper treatment. Anand Clinic & Research Centre is such an institution, where patient can step in with confidence, which is capably led by Dr. Dheerandra Arya.
92 mois0 -
5 min 54
AAA - WISHES
Les membres actuels : Takahiro Nishijima (leader, leader vocal & danse) Naoya Urata (sub-leader, lead vocal & danse) Misako Uno (lead vocal des filles & danse) Mitsuhiro Hidaka (rap, vocal & danse) Shinjiro Atae (danse, vocal & sub-rap) Shuta Sueyoshi (leader danse, vocal & sub-rap) Chiaki Ito (danse & chant) Les membres partis : Yukari Goto (leader danse des filles, vocal) Elle a quitté le groupe le 11 Juin 2007 pour des soucis de santé et travaille actuellement dans une société de publicité. Biographie : Le groupe est passé major en septembre 2005. AAA signifie Attack All Around et est constitué de 8 chanteurs et danseurs. Au début le groupe est composé de 6 membres : Takahiro est le leader, Naoya, Shinjiro, Shuta, Mitsuhiro et Misako, la seule fille, ce n'est après qu'Avex Trax, leur maison de disques, décide d'ajouter deux filles. Certaines chansons, comme Friday Party, ont été préparées lorsqu'ils n'étaient que 5 et laisse donc peu de place à Chiaki et Yukari, les deux nouvelles, elles n'ont aucune ligne chantée sauf dans les refrains. A noter que Shuta, Shinjiro, Chiaki et Yukari sont dit comme étant des dance members. En été 2005, Avex Trax a annoncé qu'il formerait un nouveau groupe très important, et qui bénéficierait de beaucoup de publicité dès son debut, c'est ainsi que de Septembre à Décembre, ils sortent un single par mois, et en janvier 2006, un premier album. Ils ont donc beaucoup de pression et n'ont pas pas le temps de faire des lives à la télé pour toutes les chansons. Les clips qui passent à la télé sont raccourcis, car les versions entières sont inclues dans les DVD ajoutés aux CD (il y a donc 2 versions à chaque fois). Les singles ne se ressemblent pas, ils changent de style et de rythme. Les AAA ont la chance d'être toujours dans le top 10 en ce qui concerne leurs ventes, et ce, depuis leur début en 2005. Même après -bientôt- 5 ans d'existence, le groupe garde la cadence. Son public (mixte ! ) n'est pas près de les lâcher de si tôt.
1302 mois0 -
1 min 00
Etape 1: Résumé
Gustav Larsson est le premier leader du Paris-Nice 2012. Le Suédois de l'équipe Vacansoleil a remporté le contre-la-montre initial.
3 0543 mois0 -
3 min 46
[MV] B.A.P - Secret Love
B. A. P (비에이피) est le 1er boysband de la TS Entertainment, qui a fait ses débuts officiels le 25 janvier 2012 avec le single 'Warrior'. D'ailleurs, leur premier single a été vendu a plus de 10 000 exemplaires en seulement 2 jours. Le MV de Warrior a reçu près d'un million de vues en moins de 10 jours et B. A. P a été classé 10e sur le classement 'World Album' de Billboard.com, ils ont aussi été classé 54ème dans le top 100 du chart Gaon avec le titre Warrior. Depuis 2010 aucun nouveau groupe n'est parvenu à entrer dans ce classement, même en 99-100 ème position. Prouvant ainsi le succès immédiat du groupe sur la scène coréenne, mais aussi internationale. Le groupe a tenu un Showcase pour leur début le 28 janvier 2012. Plus de 3000 fans coréens et internationaux y ont assistés. Le 10 février 2012, la TS Entertainment a annoncé le nom du fanclub officiel du groupe, 'BABY'. C'est le nom que le leader, Bang Yong Guk donnait à ses fans avant les débuts de B. A. P. Les membres se seraient tous mis d'accord pour conserver le même nom. Le groupe n'a pas encore de couleur officielle. B. A. P est l'abréviation de Best, Absolute, Perfect, que les membres ont eux même traduit par « We pursue Best, Absolute, and Perfect value. » (soit « Nous poursuivons la meilleure, absolue et parfaite valeur. » en français) Bien avant leur début, certains membres étaient déjà assez bien connu du public. Bang Yong Guk avait commencé une carrière solo (Going Crazy avec Jieun de SECRET, I Remember avec Yoseob de BEAST). Un peu plus tard, la TS Ent. annonce un nouveau duo, composé du leader et du maknae (BANG & ZELO) . Ils feront alors la promotion de leur titre old school 'Never Give Up'. Himchan, quant à lui, était connu en tant qu'uzzland & MC à l'émission 'The Show'. Lors de l'annonce du groupe, l'identité de Jongup, Daehyun et Youngjae restèrent secrètes jusqu'à l'arrivée du premier épisode de 'TA-DAH it's B. A. P', une émission de MTV leur étant consacrée. Leur toute première performance live a eu lieu le 27 janvier 2012 @ KBS Music Bank. Ils reviendront le 1er mars 2012 avec un autre titre de leur mini-album 'Secret Love' en duo avec JiEun des Secret (autre groupe star du label). MEMBRES Bang Yong Guk (방용국) Leader & Rappeur principal Kim Him Chan (김힘찬) Chanteur Jung Dae Hyun (정대현) Chanteur principal Mun Jong Eop (문종업) Vocaliste & Danseur principal Yu Young Jae (유영재) Chanteur principal Choi Jun Hong (최준홍) / ZELO Maknae & Rappeur & Danseur principal
1733 mois0 -
11 sec
Eva Joly veut "pimenter sa vie"
A son arrivée au salon de l'agriculture jeudi, Eva Joly a reçu de José Bové un pot de piment d'espelette. De quoi "pimenter la campagne" pour le leader paysan et de quoi "pimenter ma vie" s'est amusée la candidate d'EELV.
1 0503 mois0 -
34 sec
Hollande : les Français de Londres "savent que la finance n’est pas régulée"
François Hollande était mercredi à Londres pour rencontrer Ed Miliband, le leader travailliste anglais, ainsi que les Français vivant dans la capitale anglaise.
1 7123 mois0 -
3 min 54
[MV] BIG BANG - Bad Boy
Big Bang est un groupe coréen de hip-hop/RnB faisant partie de le YG Family, produit de la YG Entertainement (qui est également le label d'artistes tels que Se7en, Jinusean, 1TYM, Gummy, 2NE1).Les talents de BIG BANG sont multiples:chant, rap, danse, écriture. Le groupe était initialement composé de six membres : G-Dragon, Tae Yang, T. O. P, Dae Sung, Seung Ri et SO-1. Le groupe devant compter cinq membres, ce dernier, étant jugé le moins performant des six garçons, dût quitter BIG BANG. Actuellement, le groupe compte donc cinq membres. MEMBRES G-Dragon Nom réel : Kwon JiYong (권지용) Surnom : G-Dragon, G-D Date de naissance : 18 Août 1988 Position : Leader / Rappeur / Chanteur / Compositeur T.O.P Nom réel : Choi SeungHyun (최승현) Surnom : T. O. P Date de naissance : 4 Novembre 1987 Position : Beat Boxer / Compositeur / Rappeur Tae Yang Nom réel : Dong YoungBae (동영배) Surnoms : Tae Yang, Sol, YB Taekwon Date de naissance : 18 Mai 1988 Position : Leader vocal / Chorégraphe / Compositeur Dae Sung Nom réel : Kang DaeSung (강대성) Surnoms : Dae Sung, D-Lite Date de naissance : 26 Avril 1989 Position : Chanteur Seung Ri Nom réel : Lee SeungHyun (이승현) Surnoms : Seung Ri, VI, Victory Date de naissance : 12 Décembre 1990 Position : Chorégraphe / Vocaliste / Chanteur Ancien membre : So-1 Nom réel : Jang HyunSeung (장현승) Date de naissance : 3 Septembre 1989 Il fait maintenant partie du groupe BEAST CHRONOLOGIE •2005 / 2006• Avant le succès de Big Bang, chaque membre connait un certain succès et une certaine popularité, indépendamment des autres, à degrès différents, au sein de la YG Entertainment. G-Dragon et Tae Yang font partie de YG Entertainment depuis l'âge de douze ans et sont alors connus sous les noms de G-D et YB Taekwon (le vrai nom de Tae Yang est YoungBae). T. O. P dévoile ses talents de rappeur pendant que SeungRi s'intègre à la YG grâce au show télévisé "Let's Cokeplay Battle Shinhwa". Lorsque les six candidats sont sélectionnés pour tenter de rejoindre BIG BANG commence le tournage d'un documentaire sensé retracer la naissance du groupe. Il montre les membres pendant leurs entrainements, avant qu'ils ne deviennent un groupe officiel. Le documentaire comprend 10 épisodes, plus un onzième, tourné après le choix final des membres du groupe. Chacun des six premiers épisodes se concentre sur un candidat en particulier et sa motivation à devenir chanteur, à rejoindre le groupe. Le documentaire décrit la difficulté des entraînements en montrant les séances de pratique de danse et de chant. Deux membres sont sélectionnés pour l'élimination. Il s'agit de SeungRi et So-1. Ils sont priés de montrer ce qu'ils savent faire devant le CEO de la YG, Yang HyunSuk. Ce dernier, trouvant So-1 trop timide, décide de l'éliminer. Par contre, il est impressionné par la performance de SeungRi au niveau du chant et de la danse et choisit d'en faire un membre du groupe. Avant le choix final du nom du groupe, les membres proposent d'autres noms comme "Apex", "Stump, " et "Diamond". Finalement, Yang HyunSuk décide que le groupe s'appellera BIG BANG. Le groupe fait ses débuts au concert de la YG Family, le 19 Août 2006, à l'Arène de Gymnastique dans le Parc Olympique de Séoul. Avant la sortie de leur premier album, trois premiers EP sortent en quelques mois. Le premier EP, "The First Single Album", contenant la chanson "This Love" (une reprise du groupe Maroon 5), entre dans le top 10. Le cd se vend à environ 40. 000 exemplaires. Le second EP est "BIG BANG is V. I. P". Il sort un mois après le premier et se vend à 32. 000 copies. Enfin le troisième, "B I G B A N G 0 3", suit le modèle des deux opus précédents et se vend à 30. 000 exemplaires. Plus tard dans l'année, BIG BANG crée son propre fan-club, se nommant eux-mêmes "V. I. P", en référence à l'un de leurs cds. À la différence d'autres fan-clubs, les fans de BIG BANG n'ont pas de couleur de ballon pour montrer leur soutien aux concerts; au lieu de cela les fans de BIG BANG arborent mouchoirs et bandanas noirs et blancs (représentant évidemment le big bang). Fin décembre 2006, BIG BANG donne son premier concert : "The Real". Le mois suivant, leur premier album fait son entrée dans les bacs. Il s'intitule "Since 2007" et est essentiellement composé des chansons de leurs précédents singles. Il se vend à plus de 48. 000 copies. •2007 / 2008• Le 8 Février 2007 sort l'album live du concert de BIG BANG : "The First / Real Live Concert". Il s'écoule à 30. 000 exemplaires. Entre Mai et Juillet 2007, BIG BANG exécute sa première tournée en Corée. Les membres donnent des concerts dans cinq grandes villes coréennes : Incheon, Daegu, Changwon, Jeonju et Busan. En Août 2007, le groupe réalise son premier mini album intitulé "Always". BIG BANG prend peu à peu le contrôle de sa musique : le leader, G-Dragon, écrit et produit quelques chansons de l'opus. Le mini-album est bien accueilli par les critiques et par les fans, spécialement la chanson "Lies". "Lies" devient le premier tube de BIG BANG, elle se classe numéro un du "SBS Hit Songs", suivi de "MBC's Music Core", "KBS Music Bank" et "Mnet's Countdown". Elle conserve sa première place dans les charts pendant plusieurs semaines. Le mini-album connaît un tel succès que BIG BANG reçoit plusieurs récompenses fin 2007, dont "Le Meilleur Groupe Masculin" et "La Chanson de l'Année"duFestivaldeMusiqueM.NET/KM 2007. Plus tard, en 2008, BIG BANG remporte le prestigieux "Daesang" aux 17ème Prix de Musique de Séoul. Le second mini-album du groupe "Hot Issue" sort quelques mois après et connaît un succès similaire à celui du précédent. Cela grâce à une chanson "Last Farewell" qui, à la manière de "Lies" précédemment, permet au groupe de remporter un prix : "Prix de Musique Numérique : Chanson du Mois", par Cyworld, face à de forts adversaires comme les Wonder Girls ou encore les F. T Island. "Last Farewell" restera numéro un des charts durant plusieurs semaines. Les billets pour la seconde programmation de concerts de BIG BANG, entre le 28 et 30 décembre 2008, seront vendus en dix minutes. Après son succès en Corée du Sud, BIG BANG décide de s'exporter au Japon. Leur album japonais "For The World" est composé de leurs précédents singles et d'une autre chanson "How Gee". Les 28 et 29 Mars, BIG BANG se produit en concert au JCB hall, au Tokyo Dome. En Mai, un mini-album sort de nouveau au Japon : "With U". Le groupe rentre en Corée mi-2008 pour que chaque membre se consacre à ses projets solos. Finalement, un troisième mini-album sort : "Stand Up". Il est crée avec l'aide de Daishi Dance et d'un groupe de punk/rock pour la chanson "Oh My Friend". La première chanson présentée par cet album est "Day By Day".Comme dans les précédents albums, G-Dragon écrit et produit les chansons de l'album à l'exception de "A Good Man", dont l'auteur n'est autre que T. O. P. Le mini-album s'écoule à 100. 000 exemplaires. Les chansons occuperont toutes une bonne place dans les charts du Top 20 pendant six semaines : "Day by Day" sera numéro un, "Heaven" deuxième, "Oh My Friend" neuvième, "A Good Man" douzième et "Lady" seizième : un total de cinq chansons dans le top 20 pour le groupe. "Remember" sort en Corée fin 2008. Son titre phare "Sunset Glow" rencontrera un franc succès. Fin 2008, BIG BANG recueille son deuxième "Artiste de l'Année" à la cérémonie deprixdeFestivaldeMusiquedeKMM.NET 2008. •2009• Le groupe fait un break début 2009. Chacun se consacre à ses projets solos. Pendant cette période, BIG BANG collabore avec un nouveau groupe féminin de la YG Entertainment, 2NE1, dans le cadre d'une campagne publicitaire pour une célèbre marque de téléphonie mobile. Ensemble, ils chantent "Lollipop", qui gagnera très vite la première place de plusieurs classements. En Mai 2009, BIG BANG sort un nouveau single japonais, "My Heaven", une chanson de l'un de leurs précédents albums ("Heaven" du mini-album "Stand Up"), chantée en japonais cette fois-ci. En juillet 2009, sort le single japonais "Gara Gara Go". Il est composé de quatre titres : "Gara Gara Go", "Top Of The World", "Stylish" et "So Beautiful". Un album japonnais est prévu pour le 19 Aout 2009 : "BIGBANG". De plus, YG a signé un contrat avec 'Sudden Attack' afin de faire apparaître BIG BANG en personnages de jeu vidéo online. Chacun des membres aura son propre personnage, avec ses effets sonores et spéciaux propres à chacun. En Aout, Dae Sung est victime d'un terrible accident de la route qui le contraint à renoncer à ses activités professionnelles sur une durée de huit semaines. Il renonce donc au Musical "Shouting" dans lequel Seung Ri apparait seul. Le groupe apparaît pour un show signé BIG BANG, au SBS's Idol Big Show. Dae Sung n'est pas présent mais c'est bien en tant que BIG BANG que les quatre autres membres assurent le spectacle. Cette performance est la première depuis plus de dix mois. En juillet/août ils apparaissent aussi dans une émission en plusieurs épisodessurM.NET en compagnie des 2NE1. Cette émission, YGTV, permet de découvrir les coulisses des deux groupes, un peu à la manière du documentaire dans les débuts de BIG BANG en 2006. La deuxième moitié de 2009 est marquée par le retour des membres de BIG BANG dans des projets solos. G-Dragon sort son premier album solo "Heartbreaker" qui rencontre un franc succès. Tae Yang sort deux singles "Where U At" (feat Teddy) et "Wedding Dress". Quand à T. O P. , il se fait remarquer pour son rôle dans le drama "IRIS" qui obtient un taux d'audience très élevé. On voit aussi Seung Ri au cinéma. En novembre 2009, sort le troisième single japonais, "Koe wo Kikasete". BIG BANG se produit alors sur scène lors de nombreuses live performances. •2010• Début 2010, BIG BANG enchaine les concerts. D'abord le "Big Show 2010" en janvier, puis "Electric Love Tour" au Japon en février. Ce dernier concert aura la chance d'être ensuite diffusé sur TBS pour le plus grand plaisir des fans du groupe. En février 2010, Cyon lance une campagne de publicité en compagnie de BIG BANG. Il s'agit de trouver une Lollipop Girl qui aura l'opportunité de tourner un CF en compagnie du groupe. BIG BANG sort à cette occasion le digital single "Lollipop pt. 2". En avril 2010, YG Entertainment annonce le retour de BIG BANG en Corée avec deux nouveaux mini-albums prévus. En mai 2010, BIG BANG fait partie d'une nouvelle campagne publicitaire en compagnie de Kim Yuna et du groupe Trans Fixion pour soutenir l'équipe coréenne de Football lors de la coupe du monde en Afrique du Sud. Ils collaborent donc pour un nouveau digital single intitulé "Victory Cry". Début juin, sortira le single japonais "Tell Me Goodbye" dont la chanson principale fait partie de l'OST du drama "IRIS", diffusé au Japon et dont T. O. P est l'un des acteurs principaux. Ce dernier partagera l'affiche du film "Into The Gunfire" avec l'acteur Kang Sang Woo. Ce film sortira dans les salles coréennes en Juin 2010. En attendant le nouvel album coréen, BIG BANG sort son 5ème single japonais, nommé Beautiful Hangover le 25 août....
4033 mois0 -
4 min 06
KARA - Speed Up MV
KARA (카라 en Corée, カラ au Japon) est un girlsband coréen ayant pour style de musique la K-Pop et le K-R&B. Il est créé en 2007 sous le label DSP Media (qui produisait en autre Fin. K. L, Lee Hyori, et SS501) composé à la base de quatre jeunes filles : Gyuri (Leader), Seung Yeon, Sung Hee et Nicole; il comptera cinq membres, un an après leur début. Le nom du groupe, choisit par la leader Gyuri vient du mot grec "χαρά" (littéralement, "joie") dont le groupe l'a interprété comme "douce mélodie". Le groupe possède un fancblub : Kamilia (KARA + Familia, (카밀리아) ) et leur couleur est le orange perle (pêche). Composition Actuelle : Gyuri (Gyulee) née le 21 Mai 1988. Positions : Leader, chanteuse principale. Seung Yeon née le 24 Juillet 1988. Position : Leader vocale. Nicole née le 7 Octobre 1991. Positions : Rappeuse principale / Chanteuse principale, danseuse Note : Nicole est née et a grandi aux USA. Elle était la maknae avant que Sung Hee ne quitte le groupe. Hara née le 13 Janvier 1991. Positions : Danseuse principale, chanteuse secondaire. Note : Elle rejoint le groupe en 2008. Ji Young née le 18 Janvier 1994. Positions : Maknae (la plus jeune), chanteuse. Note : Elle a rejoint le groupe en 2008 suite au départ de Sung Hee. Anciens Membres : Sung Hee Position : Leader Vocale Notes : Sung Hee a quitté le groupe afin de se consacrer à ses études. Elle annonce en 2011, son mariage avec Yang Won Joon. Le quatuor débute donc avec un premier album "The First Bloooooming", sorti le 29 Mars 2007, et font leur première apparition au M ! Countdown avec leur chanson-titre "Break It", le 27 Mars 2007. Pour ce premier album, le groupe a tourné deux clips : "Break It" ainsi que "If U Wanna". Le groupe a souvent été comparé à Fin. K. L dû au fait que les groupes avaient signé avec le même label, et avaient également un style similaire. Avec ce premier album, KARA remporte le prix du de la meilleure révélation musicale. Cependant, cette même année, d'autres girlsband dont Wonder Girls et Girls' Generation marquent leur début. L'album n'ayant pas remporté un franc succès, Seung Yeon a participé à de nombreuses émissions de variétés afin de garder le groupe au top. En 2008, alors qu'un comeback est prévu avec à la clef un second album, Sung Hee quitte le groupe, afin de se consacrer à ses études, et sera remplacée par deux nouvelles membres (qui formeront la composition finale du groupe) : Hara ainsi que Ji Young. Cette nouvelle formation fait son comeback avec un mini-album du nom de Rock U qui a pour concept "mignon", ainsi qu'avec sa piste-titre "Rock U". Leur première performance en compagnie des deux nouvelles membres se fera au M ! Countdown le 24 Juillet 2008. Le 29 Novembre 2008, DSP Media sort un teaser vidéo de leur prochain single "Pretty Girl" qui reçoit plus de 40, 000 vues en 12 heures. Le clip entier est sorti le 2 Décembre 2008 et reçoit des commentaires positives du public, le mini-album lui est sorti le 4 décembre et avait pour concept "party/fun". Le groupe a fait son comeback le 4 Décembre 2008 sur M ! CountDown. Pendant leur première performance national sur KBS 'Music Bank', Hara a accidentellement poussé un cri lorsque Ji Young dû changé de place à cause de la chorégraphie. Cette dernière lui aurait marché sur le pied, et Hara ne se souvenant plus des pas et étant un peu perdu cria un "AH ! " qui fut entendu par les spectateurs. A cause de l'embrassement, elle a pleuré pendant plus d'une heure dans les backstage. Les internautes ont en fait une "hot issue" mais Hara a reçu du réconfort au lieu des critiques du public. "Pretty Girl" devient alors un hit pour le groupe. Fin Janvier 2009, DSP Media annonce que les votes pour la prochaine chanson des KARA débutera le 28 Janvier et se terminera sur leur site officiel. Le 2 Février, Honey est déclaré vainqueur avec 60% des votes. Honey a fait gagner le groupe pour la première fois à M ! Countdown, elles ont aussi gagné un Mutizen à SBS 'The Music Trend'. Il a été révélé qu'en Juin 2009 le groupe reviendrait en Juillet avec un concept qui va être 'mis à jour'. La première photo teaser a été révélé mi-juillet et montre un changement radical du style du groupe. Le clip est sorti le 29 Juillet avec l'album au complet 'Revolution'. La promotion a démarré le 31 Juillet avec leur comeback sur Music Bank où elles ont chanté 'Wanna' ainsi que 'Mister'. 'Mister' a été très populaire auprès des internautes pour la 'butt dance'. 'Wanna' et 'Mister' sont alors devenus deux gros hits en Corée. Durant la promotion de Revolution le groupe a fait des performances internationale, incluant le 'Bangkok's Parc Paragon'. Après une courte pause, DSP Media publie deux photos teaser du comeback des KARA, le 9 Février 2010. Les photos ont gagné beaucoup d'intérêt parce qu'en comparaison avec leur dernier album les KARA présentent une image plus mature et mystérieuse. Le lendemain la couverture de l'album fut révélé avec un concept de 'voleuse' et le titre de la chanson principale, 'Lupin'. La chanson a rapidement été #1 dans des sites de téléchargements en lignes, avec cela, le groupe gagnera de nombreux prix, les semaines qui suivent. La même année, l'agence annonce que KARA fera ses débuts officiels au Japon. Leur premier titre, à cette occasion, sera le célèbre hit "Mister" qui sera réarrangé en japonais, paroles écrites et signées par Watanabe Natsumi. Deux albums suivront, ainsi qu'un autre single "Jumping". A noté que le groupe fera parallèlement la promotion de "Jumping" en Corée. L'année 2011 est marquée par une controverse alors que le groupe était en pleine promotion au Japon, en effet, certains des membres (Hara, Seung Yeon, Nicole et Ji Young) du groupe avaient demandé la résiliation de leur contrat, bloquant ainsi les activités du groupe en ce début d'année. Seule Gyuri voulait continuer n'étant pas au courant des poursuites que voulaient engager les membres. Hara se rétractera et c'est finalement fin avril, que les différents opposant les deux partis s'estompent. A cela, deux nouveaux singles japonais du groupe sortent, "Jet Coaster Love" sorti en avril, et "GO GO Summer ! " sorti en juin. Il a été annoncé, il y a peu que KARA sera de retour à la rentrée 2011 avec un nouvel album coréen.
3633 mois0 -
3 min 56
[MV] BIG BANG - Bad Boy
Big Bang est un groupe coréen de hip-hop/RnB faisant partie de le YG Family, produit de la YG Entertainement (qui est également le label d'artistes tels que Se7en, Jinusean, 1TYM, Gummy, 2NE1).Les talents de BIG BANG sont multiples:chant, rap, danse, écriture. Le groupe était initialement composé de six membres : G-Dragon, Tae Yang, T. O. P, Dae Sung, Seung Ri et SO-1. Le groupe devant compter cinq membres, ce dernier, étant jugé le moins performant des six garçons, dût quitter BIG BANG. Actuellement, le groupe compte donc cinq membres. MEMBRES G-Dragon Nom réel : Kwon JiYong (권지용) Surnom : G-Dragon, G-D Date de naissance : 18 Août 1988 Position : Leader / Rappeur / Chanteur / Compositeur T.O.P Nom réel : Choi SeungHyun (최승현) Surnom : T. O. P Date de naissance : 4 Novembre 1987 Position : Beat Boxer / Compositeur / Rappeur Tae Yang Nom réel : Dong YoungBae (동영배) Surnoms : Tae Yang, Sol, YB Taekwon Date de naissance : 18 Mai 1988 Position : Leader vocal / Chorégraphe / Compositeur Dae Sung Nom réel : Kang DaeSung (강대성) Surnoms : Dae Sung, D-Lite Date de naissance : 26 Avril 1989 Position : Chanteur Seung Ri Nom réel : Lee SeungHyun (이승현) Surnoms : Seung Ri, VI, Victory Date de naissance : 12 Décembre 1990 Position : Chorégraphe / Vocaliste / Chanteur Ancien membre : So-1 Nom réel : Jang HyunSeung (장현승) Date de naissance : 3 Septembre 1989 Il fait maintenant partie du groupe BEAST CHRONOLOGIE •2005 / 2006• Avant le succès de Big Bang, chaque membre connait un certain succès et une certaine popularité, indépendamment des autres, à degrès différents, au sein de la YG Entertainment. G-Dragon et Tae Yang font partie de YG Entertainment depuis l'âge de douze ans et sont alors connus sous les noms de G-D et YB Taekwon (le vrai nom de Tae Yang est YoungBae). T. O. P dévoile ses talents de rappeur pendant que SeungRi s'intègre à la YG grâce au show télévisé "Let's Cokeplay Battle Shinhwa". Lorsque les six candidats sont sélectionnés pour tenter de rejoindre BIG BANG commence le tournage d'un documentaire sensé retracer la naissance du groupe. Il montre les membres pendant leurs entrainements, avant qu'ils ne deviennent un groupe officiel. Le documentaire comprend 10 épisodes, plus un onzième, tourné après le choix final des membres du groupe. Chacun des six premiers épisodes se concentre sur un candidat en particulier et sa motivation à devenir chanteur, à rejoindre le groupe. Le documentaire décrit la difficulté des entraînements en montrant les séances de pratique de danse et de chant. Deux membres sont sélectionnés pour l'élimination. Il s'agit de SeungRi et So-1. Ils sont priés de montrer ce qu'ils savent faire devant le CEO de la YG, Yang HyunSuk. Ce dernier, trouvant So-1 trop timide, décide de l'éliminer. Par contre, il est impressionné par la performance de SeungRi au niveau du chant et de la danse et choisit d'en faire un membre du groupe. Avant le choix final du nom du groupe, les membres proposent d'autres noms comme "Apex", "Stump, " et "Diamond". Finalement, Yang HyunSuk décide que le groupe s'appellera BIG BANG. Le groupe fait ses débuts au concert de la YG Family, le 19 Août 2006, à l'Arène de Gymnastique dans le Parc Olympique de Séoul. Avant la sortie de leur premier album, trois premiers EP sortent en quelques mois. Le premier EP, "The First Single Album", contenant la chanson "This Love" (une reprise du groupe Maroon 5), entre dans le top 10. Le cd se vend à environ 40. 000 exemplaires. Le second EP est "BIG BANG is V. I. P". Il sort un mois après le premier et se vend à 32. 000 copies. Enfin le troisième, "B I G B A N G 0 3", suit le modèle des deux opus précédents et se vend à 30. 000 exemplaires. Plus tard dans l'année, BIG BANG crée son propre fan-club, se nommant eux-mêmes "V. I. P", en référence à l'un de leurs cds. À la différence d'autres fan-clubs, les fans de BIG BANG n'ont pas de couleur de ballon pour montrer leur soutien aux concerts; au lieu de cela les fans de BIG BANG arborent mouchoirs et bandanas noirs et blancs (représentant évidemment le big bang). Fin décembre 2006, BIG BANG donne son premier concert : "The Real". Le mois suivant, leur premier album fait son entrée dans les bacs. Il s'intitule "Since 2007" et est essentiellement composé des chansons de leurs précédents singles. Il se vend à plus de 48. 000 copies. •2007 / 2008• Le 8 Février 2007 sort l'album live du concert de BIG BANG : "The First / Real Live Concert". Il s'écoule à 30. 000 exemplaires. Entre Mai et Juillet 2007, BIG BANG exécute sa première tournée en Corée. Les membres donnent des concerts dans cinq grandes villes coréennes : Incheon, Daegu, Changwon, Jeonju et Busan. En Août 2007, le groupe réalise son premier mini album intitulé "Always". BIG BANG prend peu à peu le contrôle de sa musique : le leader, G-Dragon, écrit et produit quelques chansons de l'opus. Le mini-album est bien accueilli par les critiques et par les fans, spécialement la chanson "Lies". "Lies" devient le premier tube de BIG BANG, elle se classe numéro un du "SBS Hit Songs", suivi de "MBC's Music Core", "KBS Music Bank" et "Mnet's Countdown". Elle conserve sa première place dans les charts pendant plusieurs semaines. Le mini-album connaît un tel succès que BIG BANG reçoit plusieurs récompenses fin 2007, dont "Le Meilleur Groupe Masculin" et "La Chanson de l'Année"duFestivaldeMusiqueM.NET/KM 2007. Plus tard, en 2008, BIG BANG remporte le prestigieux "Daesang" aux 17ème Prix de Musique de Séoul. Le second mini-album du groupe "Hot Issue" sort quelques mois après et connaît un succès similaire à celui du précédent. Cela grâce à une chanson "Last Farewell" qui, à la manière de "Lies" précédemment, permet au groupe de remporter un prix : "Prix de Musique Numérique : Chanson du Mois", par Cyworld, face à de forts adversaires comme les Wonder Girls ou encore les F. T Island. "Last Farewell" restera numéro un des charts durant plusieurs semaines. Les billets pour la seconde programmation de concerts de BIG BANG, entre le 28 et 30 décembre 2008, seront vendus en dix minutes. Après son succès en Corée du Sud, BIG BANG décide de s'exporter au Japon. Leur album japonais "For The World" est composé de leurs précédents singles et d'une autre chanson "How Gee". Les 28 et 29 Mars, BIG BANG se produit en concert au JCB hall, au Tokyo Dome. En Mai, un mini-album sort de nouveau au Japon : "With U". Le groupe rentre en Corée mi-2008 pour que chaque membre se consacre à ses projets solos. Finalement, un troisième mini-album sort : "Stand Up". Il est crée avec l'aide de Daishi Dance et d'un groupe de punk/rock pour la chanson "Oh My Friend". La première chanson présentée par cet album est "Day By Day".Comme dans les précédents albums, G-Dragon écrit et produit les chansons de l'album à l'exception de "A Good Man", dont l'auteur n'est autre que T. O. P. Le mini-album s'écoule à 100. 000 exemplaires. Les chansons occuperont toutes une bonne place dans les charts du Top 20 pendant six semaines : "Day by Day" sera numéro un, "Heaven" deuxième, "Oh My Friend" neuvième, "A Good Man" douzième et "Lady" seizième : un total de cinq chansons dans le top 20 pour le groupe. "Remember" sort en Corée fin 2008. Son titre phare "Sunset Glow" rencontrera un franc succès. Fin 2008, BIG BANG recueille son deuxième "Artiste de l'Année" à la cérémonie deprixdeFestivaldeMusiquedeKMM.NET 2008. •2009• Le groupe fait un break début 2009. Chacun se consacre à ses projets solos. Pendant cette période, BIG BANG collabore avec un nouveau groupe féminin de la YG Entertainment, 2NE1, dans le cadre d'une campagne publicitaire pour une célèbre marque de téléphonie mobile. Ensemble, ils chantent "Lollipop", qui gagnera très vite la première place de plusieurs classements. En Mai 2009, BIG BANG sort un nouveau single japonais, "My Heaven", une chanson de l'un de leurs précédents albums ("Heaven" du mini-album "Stand Up"), chantée en japonais cette fois-ci. En juillet 2009, sort le single japonais "Gara Gara Go". Il est composé de quatre titres : "Gara Gara Go", "Top Of The World", "Stylish" et "So Beautiful". Un album japonnais est prévu pour le 19 Aout 2009 : "BIGBANG". De plus, YG a signé un contrat avec 'Sudden Attack' afin de faire apparaître BIG BANG en personnages de jeu vidéo online. Chacun des membres aura son propre personnage, avec ses effets sonores et spéciaux propres à chacun. En Aout, Dae Sung est victime d'un terrible accident de la route qui le contraint à renoncer à ses activités professionnelles sur une durée de huit semaines. Il renonce donc au Musical "Shouting" dans lequel Seung Ri apparait seul. Le groupe apparaît pour un show signé BIG BANG, au SBS's Idol Big Show. Dae Sung n'est pas présent mais c'est bien en tant que BIG BANG que les quatre autres membres assurent le spectacle. Cette performance est la première depuis plus de dix mois. En juillet/août ils apparaissent aussi dans une émission en plusieurs épisodessurM.NET en compagnie des 2NE1. Cette émission, YGTV, permet de découvrir les coulisses des deux groupes, un peu à la manière du documentaire dans les débuts de BIG BANG en 2006. La deuxième moitié de 2009 est marquée par le retour des membres de BIG BANG dans des projets solos. G-Dragon sort son premier album solo "Heartbreaker" qui rencontre un franc succès. Tae Yang sort deux singles "Where U At" (feat Teddy) et "Wedding Dress". Quand à T. O P. , il se fait remarquer pour son rôle dans le drama "IRIS" qui obtient un taux d'audience très élevé. On voit aussi Seung Ri au cinéma. En novembre 2009, sort le troisième single japonais, "Koe wo Kikasete". BIG BANG se produit alors sur scène lors de nombreuses live performances. •2010• Début 2010, BIG BANG enchaine les concerts. D'abord le "Big Show 2010" en janvier, puis "Electric Love Tour" au Japon en février. Ce dernier concert aura la chance d'être ensuite diffusé sur TBS pour le plus grand plaisir des fans du groupe. En février 2010, Cyon lance une campagne de publicité en compagnie de BIG BANG. Il s'agit de trouver une Lollipop Girl qui aura l'opportunité de tourner un CF en compagnie du groupe. BIG BANG sort à cette occasion le digital single "Lollipop pt. 2". En avril 2010, YG Entertainment annonce le retour de BIG BANG en Corée avec deux nouveaux mini-albums prévus. En mai 2010, BIG BANG fait partie d'une nouvelle campagne publicitaire en compagnie de Kim Yuna et du groupe Trans Fixion pour soutenir l'équipe coréenne de Football lors de la coupe du monde en Afrique du Sud. Ils collaborent donc pour un nouveau digital single intitulé "Victory Cry". Début juin, sortira le single japonais "Tell Me Goodbye" dont la chanson principale fait partie de l'OST du drama "IRIS", diffusé au Japon et dont T. O. P est l'un des acteurs principaux. Ce dernier partagera l'affiche du film "Into The Gunfire" avec l'acteur Kang Sang Woo. Ce film sortira dans les salles coréennes en Juin 2010. En attendant le nouvel album coréen, BIG BANG sort son 5ème single japonais, nommé Beautiful Hangover le 25 août....
2013 mois0 -
54 sec
Oscars: Sacha Baron Cohen répand les cendres de son ami Kim Jong-Il
L'acteur et humoriste britannique Sacha Baron Cohen connu pour ses talents de provocateur, est apparu dimanche à la cérémonie des Oscars à Hollywood en dictateur venu répandre les cendres "de feu son ami Kim Jong-Il", le défunt leader nord-coréen.
4 7593 mois0 -
1 min 41
JT TF1 - Lyon-PSG: un match fou fou fou
Le PSG perd la tête de la Ligue 1 malgré un match incroyable à Lyon achevé sur le score de 4 à 4. Montpellier est désormais leader après sa victoire contre Bordeaux. Résumé de la 25ème journée.
12 4533 mois0 -
1 min 24
Dortmund, toujours invincible ?
A domicile face à Hanovre dimanche (17h30), le Borussia Dortmund, leader de la Bundsliga, vise un 17e match consécutif sans défaite.
1 0993 mois0 -
1 min 07
3S Photonics relocalise en Essonne
Si vous voulez télécharger, allez sur http://myreplay.tv/v/v4TPPMnS . - Le leader mondial dans la fabrication d'éléments électroniques pour câbles télécom sous-marin rapatrie sa chaîne de production thaïlandaise en Essonne et cherche à recruter des jeunes bachelier - Plus sur http://wizdeo.com/s/telessonne . Pour exploitation TV, droits réservés, nous contacter sur http://wizdeo.com/s/banqueimages
453 mois0 -
9 min 15
Syria: 5 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012
Syria: 5 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012 Prevention of armed conflict: draft resolution (A/66/L.36) [34] The General Assembly strongly condemned the continued “widespread and systematic” human rights violations by the Syrian authorities and demanded that the Government immediately cease all violence and protect its people. The 193-member body adopted a resolution backing Arab League efforts to resolve the crisis in Syria, where UN officials estimate that security forces have killed well over 5,400 people since the popular uprising began last March. http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/02/97th-plenary-meeting-general-assembly.html 16 February 2012 General Assembly GA/11207 Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York Sixty-sixth General Assembly Plenary 97th Meeting (PM) General Assembly Adopts Resolution Strongly Condemning ‘Widespread and Systematic’ Human Rights Violations by Syrian Authorities Text Passes by 137 Votes in Favour to 12 against, with 17 Abstentions Strongly condemning continued widespread and systematic human rights violations by the Syrian authorities, the General Assembly today voted overwhelmingly to call on both the Government and allied forces and armed groups “to stop all violence or reprisals immediately”. Adopting an Arab-backed resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions, the Assembly expressed grave concern at the deteriorating situation in Syria, and condemned a raft of violations carried out by the authorities, such as the use of force against civilians, the killing and persecution of protestors and journalists, and sexual violence and ill-treatment, including against children. The Assembly called on Syria to abide by its obligations under international law, and demanded that the Government, in line with the 2 November 2011 Action Plan of the League of Arab States, and its decisions of 22 January and 12 February 2012, without delay, stop all violence and protect its people, release all those detained during the unrest, withdraw all armed forces from cities and towns, guarantee peaceful demonstrations and allow unhindered access for Arab League monitors and international media. The language of the resolution closely mirrored that of a text vetoed by China and the Russian Federation in the Security Council two weeks earlier. (See Press Release SC/10536) The Assembly’s action also followed a special briefing on Monday by Navi Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who expressed outrage at the bloody 11-month crackdown on opposition protesters. She warned that the Council’s failure to take action had emboldened the Syrian Government to launch an all-out assault to crush dissent, most evident in its “appalling” siege of the city of Homs. (See Press Release GA/11206) By other terms of the text adopted today, the Assembly expressed its full support for the Arab League’s decision to facilitate a Syrian-led political transition to a democratic, pluralistic political system, including through a “serious political dialogue between the [Syrian Government] and the whole spectrum of the Syrian opposition”. Reaffirming its strong commitment to Syria’s sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, it further reaffirmed that all Member States “should refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State”. The measure requested Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and all relevant United Nations bodies to support the Arab League’s ongoing efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully, including through good offices and the appointment of a Special Envoy. The Secretary-General was also requested to report to the Assembly within 15 days on the status of the resolution. Ahead of the action, the Secretariat announced that approval of those elements of the text would incur $900,000 in additional budgetary resources for an initial six months of the 2012-2013 biennium. Egypt’s representative, presenting the draft resolution on behalf of the Arab Group, described the situation in Syria as “critical” and demanded that the Government immediately end the bloodshed. He said the text was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict. Stressing that the Arab League’s efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he expressed hope that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with “one voice” on events in Syria. Syria’s representative took the floor immediately thereafter in response to the points raised by his Egyptian counterpart, and said that the Government was responding in an accelerated manner to demands for reform. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments, in line with popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and to end the violence. However, Member States must stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria, he emphasized, declaring that no State would tolerate the presence of armed terrorists on its territory. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting such armed groups, even as they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. “Stop adding fuel to the fire,” he said, pointing out that the resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate itself from armed groups “says everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did its failure to condemn terrorist acts. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” Speaking after the vote, in a statement directed largely at the Arab League, he said that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today, as the Western co-sponsors of the resolution had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the League — “broken politically and morally” — had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Most other delegations hailed the resolution’s strong calls for an end to the violence and for the Syrian Government to protect civilians. Many reiterated their firm belief that the Arab League’s Action Plan, which proposed a negotiated solution among all Syrian factions, was the best path out of the crisis. Other speakers expressed grave concern about reports of massive human rights violations in Syria, and said that ending them must be the international community’s main priority. Costa Rica’s representative, who voted in favour of the resolution, emphasized that impunity must not be tolerated and, if necessary, the situation should be referred to the International Criminal Court. At the same time, several speakers echoed the concerns raised by the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, who voted against the text and roundly denounced “attempts by imperial Powers and their allies” to trigger regime change in Syria, “even at the cost of further bloodshed”. The text represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he added. He was also among those who commended the Russian Federation’s efforts to produce a more balanced text, by placing demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups, expressing support for that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus. China’s representative expressed support for the Arab League’s position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Yet, the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he stressed, adding that actions taken by the United Nations should not complicate matters, but be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. In other action, the Assembly decided that the Marshall Islands, Sudan and the Federated States of Micronesia had all made the payments necessary to reduce their arrears under Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Under that Article, a Member State in arrears cannot vote in the General Assembly “if the amount of the arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two years”. Also speaking in explanation of position were representatives of Venezuela, Grenada, Russian Federation, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Iran, Bolivia, Argentina, India, Singapore, Viet Nam, Chile, Bangladesh and Egypt. The General Assembly will reconvene at a time and date to be announced. Background Meeting this afternoon to consider matters relating to the prevention of armed conflict, the General Assembly was expected to take action on a draft resolution on the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36). Procedural Matters The representative of Syria, recalling the Assembly’s previous meeting on the report of the Human Rights Council, said his delegation had informed Member States at the time that the earlier meeting contravened the rules of procedure, and had called on the Assembly President to obtain a legal opinion on the matter. It had been announced during that meeting that a draft resolution on Syria would be presented to the Assembly, but today it was meeting under the item “Prevention of armed conflict”. It was “pathetic” that the Syrian issue was being addressed under at least three different agenda items, he said, adding that there was clearly confusion over the matter. The Assembly’s legitimacy was at stake, he said, asking the President to provide the rules of procedure governing the current meeting. GARY FRANCIS QUINLAN (Australia), Assembly Vice-President, responded by saying it was his understanding that the Assembly President could convene a meeting at any time, under any agenda item, to consider a draft resolution presented to Member States. The representative of Yemen said his delegation had been surprised by reference to Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Action on Draft Resolution OSAMA ABDELKHALEK MAHMOUD (Egypt), introducing the draft resolution the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36) on behalf of the Arab Group, said the Assembly was meeting as that country faced “critical circumstances”. The major escalation of violence there had been condemned by the League of Arab States, the Arab Group, the United Nations and the wider international community. Demanding that the Syrian Government end the bloodshed, he said the matter was at the very top of the Arab League’s agenda. That regional body had called for an immediate and faithful implementation of the Arab Action Plan as the only way to meet the aspirations of the Syrian people, he said, stressing the primacy of the Arab solution, under the “Arab roof”, and its rejection of military intervention. The draft before the Assembly was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict, he continued. It reaffirmed Syria’s territorial integrity and supported the aims set out in the decisions and resolutions of the Arab League. Stressing that those efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he said more than 70 Member States were co-sponsoring the draft, and it was to be hoped that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with one voice on events taking place in Syria. Hopefully, the vote would also show broad and commanding support for the Arab Action Plan, he added, calling on all Member States to stand shoulder to shoulder with each other and the Syrian people by voting in favour of the text. Following that statement, the Secretariat announced that approval of the text, which requested the Secretary-General and all relevant bodies to support the Arab League’s efforts, including through good offices and by appointing a Special Envoy, would incur additional budgetary resources in the amount of $900,000 for an initial six months in the 2012-2013 biennium. Those requirements would be met through the use of commitment authority granted to the Secretary-General as related to the maintenance of international peace and security. Speaking in explanation of position, the representative of Syria said his country continued to respond in an accelerated manner to demands for reform, in response to all the points raised by Egypt’s representative in presenting the draft resolution. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments that responded to popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and prestige and to end the violence. He called on all Member States to encourage the opposition to take part in that dialogue and not to impede participation by others. In addition, he called on Member States to stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria. No country could tolerate the presence of armed terrorist groups on its territory, he emphasized. Neither would it tolerate attacks against its officials, people and institutions. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting the armed groups, even though they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. They had also cut relations with Syria without justification, which showed that they did not wish to promote peaceful reform. He called on them to stop adding fuel to the fire, pointing out that the draft resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate themselves from armed groups “said everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did their failure to condemn terrorist acts. They had paid no heed to Syria’s plans for reforms, he added. The Arab League, in its resolution supported by today’s draft, had decided to provide all forms of support to the opposition, opening the door to the funding and arming of violent groups for terrorist acts, he said. The League was providing support to countries that had long wanted to undermine Syria, and Member States should instead help Syria’s Government and people to face the challenges of extremism and terrorism, which had been documented, but not well publicized. Adopting the draft resolution would only lead to a worsening of the crisis by encouraging extremism, he warned, appealing to all Member States to vote against the text lest they increase the chaos in Syria. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” It would also play into the hands of Israel and help its efforts to defeat the aspirations of Palestinians and other people under occupation in the region. The representative of Venezuela, affirming the fundamental importance of sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, denounced the attempt by imperial powers and their allies to trigger regime change in Syria, even at the cost of further bloodshed, reproducing the dire consequences of the Libyan situation. Those Powers sought to occupy Syria, to foment a coup against its legitimate authorities and to turn the country into a protectorate. The draft resolution, with its mentoring and monitoring mechanisms, represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he said. The text also attacked the Government for human rights abuses while hiding the heinous crimes committed by terrorist groups against civilians, as well as attacks with varied weaponry against public officials and facilities. He went on to note that the draft ignored the Government’s initiatives to promote inclusive political dialogue and its call for a referendum on a new Constitution, which were the best options for moving forward. The draft denied the Syrian State’s right to protect its population and ensure internal peace and security, he said, adding that it did not call for opposition groups to dissociate themselves from groups engaged in violence. Commending the Russian Federation’s efforts for a more balanced text, he supported that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus as well its efforts, with China, to prevent the Security Council from being used to violate Syria’s sovereignty. “It is not desirable that the logic of war, which imperialists intend to impose on Syria and the world, prevails,” he said. Instead, the Assembly should be concerned about recognition of a Palestinian State, the end of Israeli rights violations and ending the blockade on Cuba. The representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea said that any issue relating to a Member State must be discussed in line with the principles of territorial integrity and State sovereignty. As a full-fledged member of the United Nations, Syria was no exception to that rule, he said, emphasizing that all violence in Syria must stop. The issues in that country should be settled in the best interest of its people. The country’s fate and future should be in their hands and they alone should lead the process towards a peaceful negotiated solution, which should be reached without outside influence. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would vote against the text, he said. The representative of Grenada offered condolences to the families of all those who had lost loved ones in Syria and stressed that the United Nations must act — and be seen to act — in line with the tenets of its founding Charter. Grenada was proceeding with the understanding that the draft resolution would “do only what the text says” — provide diplomatic support to Syria, the Arab League and the Secretary-General in order to help the Government and people of Syria to end all bloodshed, while finding an agreed solution. It also understood that the Assembly was not voting on or for a text that could in any way be interpreted as a basis for the removal of the Government, military intervention or any act against the spirit and letter of the Charter, she said. With that understanding, Grenada would vote in favour of the draft resolution, she added. The Assembly then adopted the resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions. The representatives of Burundi, Kyrgyzstan and Comoros informed the Secretariat that they had been unable to cast their votes properly. The representative of the Russian Federation said he had opposed the resolution because it clearly did not meet the criteria for ending the violence in Syria. The Russian delegation had proposed to place reasonable demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups and to demand that those groups themselves stop their attacks, he said, noting that those amendments had not been accepted. The Russian Federation would continue to work with all those striving for regional stability, he stressed. The representative of China said his Government had closely followed developments in Syria and was deeply worried about the escalating crisis that had caused civilian casualties and affected peace and security in the wider Middle East. China condemned all acts of violence against innocent civilians and urged the Syrian Government as well as all political factions to “immediately and fully” end all acts of violence and quickly restore order. It also called on the political factions in Syria to express their political aspirations through non-violent means under the rule of law. He went on to urge all parties concerned immediately to launch an inclusive political dialogue, without preconditions, hold a referendum on the new draft Constitution, as well as early parliamentary elections, and establish a national unity Government that included all factions. “We understand the concern of Arab countries and the League of Arab States on seeking a quick resolution to this issue,” he said, expressing support for their position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Emphasizing that the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he said: “We do not approve of armed intervention or forcing a so-called regime change in Syria.” Neither did China believe that sanctions or the threat of such measures would be helpful in achieving an appropriate solution, he continued. The actions of the United Nations and the wider international community should be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. Instead of complicating matters, such actions should promote the maintenance of peace and stability in the Middle East, he said, adding that he had voted in accordance with those principles. As a friend of the Arab people, China had always followed the purposes and principles of the Charter and would continue to work with the international community to resolve the situation in Syria. The representative of Serbia said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that all international efforts should aim solely for an end to the suffering of the Syrian people. At the same time, Serbia would have wished that the proposals and amendments put forward by some delegations had been considered and evaluated. In particular, the resolution would have been enriched by some of the changes submitted by the Russian Federation, which were “truly constructive”, he said, adding that they could have led to the consensus adoption of the text. He expressed hope that the international community would nevertheless take notice of those proposed amendments as the diplomatic process progressed. “Their content cannot be avoided, and sooner or later will need to be addressed,” he said. The representative of Pakistan said he supported the Arab League position and had voted in favour of the resolution, but condemned the use of violence on all sides. An immediate end to violence and killing, as well as a peaceful resolution were aims upon which all Member States agreed. In that light, Pakistan had been stressing the need for consensus on the Syrian situation, he said, noting that there could have been better efforts in the Assembly and the Security Council to reach consensus and to fully assure delegations that there was no intention to carry out a hostile intervention. Reiterating his call for the Syrian people to be respected, he said they must be allowed to resolve their crisis, and he reaffirmed the absolute importance of respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of all States. The representative of Costa Rica expressed his delegation’s deepest concern about the gruesome human rights violations being carried out in Syria. The international community could not remain silent, he stressed, calling on the Syrian authorities to definitively end attacks against civilians and other human rights violations. Condemning reports of sexual violence, including that perpetrated against girls and boys, he said all international stakeholders should work towards a swift and peaceful solution to the crisis, in line with the Arab League’s Plan of Action. The Human Rights Council had been playing its role of promoting a peaceful solution and, with the appropriate tools already at its disposal, it should move to create the position of Special Rapporteur on the situation in Syria, he said, calling attention to that Council’s report on the very serious acts — pointing to possible crimes against humanity — being carried out in Syria. Expressing concern that the Security Council had been unable to act on the matter, he said it had been prevented from acting by the use of a veto. The Council required deep reform, chiefly so that such measures could not be used to stymie action in the face of the worst international crimes, he emphasized. Stakeholders might disagree on certain matters, but the international community must speak resoundingly when human rights violations and acts of violence against civilians were committed. The international community should explore all avenues to reach a solution and ensure that those who had committed grave crimes were held responsible, including through referring the Syrian issue to the International Criminal Court. Finally, he said the “voices of change cannot be silenced with violence”, and called for a solution that met the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people. The representative of Ukraine said that the Arab League’s peaceful efforts for a negotiated settlement deserved the Assembly’s support. Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs had issued a statement last week in which it had expressed grave concern at the escalating violence in Syria, “which threatens to grow into a full-scale civil war, with unpredictable consequences in the entire Middle East”. Ukraine urged all parties in Syria to cease the violence and begin a dialogue, with the aim of finding a mutually acceptable and effective way to resolve their differences. The representative of Iran said he had voted against the resolution, in line with his delegation’s position that the Syrian people’s legitimate demands must be addressed through a peaceful and domestically led political process and without foreign intervention in the country’s internal affairs, which would only worsen the crisis and have ramifications on the region as a whole. He regretted, in addition, that the Assembly’s consideration of the Syrian crisis had not followed proper procedure, including the vote under the agenda item “prevention of armed conflict”, which did not apply. It was even more regrettable, he continued, that the resolution’s co-sponsors had chosen not to accommodate any amendments that might have made it more balanced, comprehensive and suited to the real situation on the ground. In that light, it was necessary to be clear and steadfast in condemning any act of violence and terrorism, in any form and manifestation, he emphasized. As long as armed groups continued to resort to violence, the crisis would continue, serving the interests of the Zionist regime. All States must work together in a practical manner to assist a peaceful resolution of the crisis. The representative of Bolivia, stating that he had voted against the resolution, asked the Assembly to consider exactly what was happening in Syria. With the many possibilities and few answers, it was clear that no one really knew exactly what the real situation was. All that was known was that there was a recognized opposition and a Government that was prepared to undertake meaningful reforms. Indeed, Syria’s representative had twice informed the Assembly that such reforms, including constitutional changes, had been agreed and were under way. Saying he understood that such reforms were a work in progress, he added that Bolivia knew the dangers of a political vacuum, which could lead to destabilization of the entire region. He said there were two possible ways in which the Syrian situation could end, the first being “the way of Libya”, in which the United Nations had facilitated a “recipe for intervention” to justify regime change through a Security Council resolution. That text had actually promoted further destabilization and civil unrest, he pointed out, warning: “I fear we have not learned our lessons from that situation.” He added: “Last year, it was the Security Council and this year it appears to be the General Assembly.” Bolivia seriously hoped that that was not the case, but had voted against the resolution just the same. The other possible ending was through a peaceful resolution, as had occurred in Egypt and Tunisia, he said. In those cases, efforts had been channelled towards democracy and changes of Government borne by the will of the people, not foreign intervention. Hopefully, the winds of the “Arab Spring” would blow in Syria’s direction and stir peaceful change, he said, adding that, had the amendments put forward by the Russian Federation been integrated into the resolution, it would have been adopted by consensus. The representative of Argentina said he had voted in favour of the resolution and emphasized the utmost importance of ensuring the protection and promotion of human rights in Syria. It was necessary to preserve the fundamental rights of free association and expression, he said, adding that the crisis in Syria should be resolved through dialogue and democratic negotiations involving all sectors of society. The representative of India noted that his country had condemned all violence in Syria, no matter by whom it was committed, and had been supporting a peaceful, inclusive and nationally led political resolution of the crisis. India had voted in favour of the resolution, in accordance with its support for the Arab League’s efforts for such a political resolution. Regrettably, however, there had been exceptions to established General Assembly procedures during the week, he said, expressing a wish that there had been greater readiness from all quarters to negotiate a text with a view to reaching consensus. He went on to note that the resolution expressly reaffirmed that all countries should refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State. It condemned all violence, irrespective of its origin, and called for serious political dialogue under the Arab League. The country’s leadership was a matter for the Syrian people to decide, he stressed, calling on all opposition forces to engage peacefully in constructive dialogue with the authorities. In that connection, he noted the Syrian leadership’s decision to hold a referendum and multi-party elections, expressing hope that that decision would create an environment of peace and facilitate a political process. The representative of Singapore said he had voted in favour of the resolution because it was not a politically motivated text, but instead dealt with a unique emergency in an appropriate manner. He joined with all in calling on all stakeholders to end violence and resolve the situation peacefully. The representative of Viet Nam, affirming his country’s concern about developments in Syria, joined the call for all parties in Syria to exercise self-restraint, end the violence and find a political solution through a domestically led constructive dialogue and national reconciliation, in conformity with the people’s aspirations. He also underlined the importance of respecting the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of States. Viet Nam supported efforts by the international community, including the Arab League, to contribute constructively to the restoration of stability and the promotion of national reconciliation in Syria, he said. The representative of Chile said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that the Assembly had raised its voice to “energetically” condemn the “grave and massive” violations of human rights under way in Syria. Serious acts, such as torture, sexual violence and arbitrary detention, including those highlighted by the High Commissioner for Human Rights in her briefing earlier in the week, must be denounced and those responsible brought to justice, he emphasized. All parties in Syria must open a true dialogue, and the authorities must allow access to those in need, he added. The representative of Bangladesh said he had voted in favour of the resolution. Despite its principled position of abstaining when texts targeted human rights situations in specific countries, Bangladesh had voted in favour of today’s resolution to end the shedding of the Syrian people’s blood, he said. The Assembly’s decision earlier in the week to consider the report of the Human Rights Council had contravened its rules of procedure, he said, expressing hope that no precedent would result from that action. The resolution had been drafted in line with the aims of the Arab League Action Plan, but Bangladesh would have hoped for the inclusion of the amendments submitted by the Russian Federation, he said, emphasizing that any actions taken in Syria must be in line with the aspirations of its people and lead towards a peaceful resolution. The representative of Egypt then made a general statement, saying that the international community had made its views known through its overwhelming support for the resolution. It had reaffirmed the need for a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis and sent a clear message to the Government to listen to the voice of the Syrian people and implement the decisions of the Arab League. The situation was deteriorating and all should now focus on ending the violence and meeting the people’s aspirations in order to avoid a worse situation, which would have effects in the region and lead to a humanitarian crisis. Egypt would continue to work with the League in that effort, he pledged. The representative of Syria also made a general statement, saying that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today as the resolution’s Western co-sponsors had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the Arab League had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Syria had left the Arab League temporarily; it was broken, politically and morally, he said, congratulating it on its new alliance with Israel. Syria no longer wanted the League to stand by it following its shameful actions, but it did want them to save whatever face it had left and cease the plotting against other Arab States. He went on to warn that the wealth of all the Gulf Cooperation Council countries would be squandered on losing causes and the price would be borne by all Arabs, who would be used as fuel to obtain the objectives of Israel and the West. Had the co-sponsors retained any credibility, they would have accepted the Russian amendments and worked to counter support for armed groups in Syria. In addition, the United Nations was betraying its own principles, and if that continued, the Organization would collapse, destroying the normative efforts of the past 66 years, he said. That would be the end result of intervention in the internal affairs of others. * *** * For information media • not an official record http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/ga11207.doc.htm ----------------------------------------------------------- Source: Name: United Nations Webcast Website: www.unmultimedia.org Country: United States of America ----------------------------------------------------------
73 mois0 -
30 min 00
Syria: 4 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012
Syria: 4 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012 Prevention of armed conflict: draft resolution (A/66/L.36) [34] The General Assembly strongly condemned the continued “widespread and systematic” human rights violations by the Syrian authorities and demanded that the Government immediately cease all violence and protect its people. The 193-member body adopted a resolution backing Arab League efforts to resolve the crisis in Syria, where UN officials estimate that security forces have killed well over 5,400 people since the popular uprising began last March. http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/02/97th-plenary-meeting-general-assembly.html 16 February 2012 General Assembly GA/11207 Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York Sixty-sixth General Assembly Plenary 97th Meeting (PM) General Assembly Adopts Resolution Strongly Condemning ‘Widespread and Systematic’ Human Rights Violations by Syrian Authorities Text Passes by 137 Votes in Favour to 12 against, with 17 Abstentions Strongly condemning continued widespread and systematic human rights violations by the Syrian authorities, the General Assembly today voted overwhelmingly to call on both the Government and allied forces and armed groups “to stop all violence or reprisals immediately”. Adopting an Arab-backed resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions, the Assembly expressed grave concern at the deteriorating situation in Syria, and condemned a raft of violations carried out by the authorities, such as the use of force against civilians, the killing and persecution of protestors and journalists, and sexual violence and ill-treatment, including against children. The Assembly called on Syria to abide by its obligations under international law, and demanded that the Government, in line with the 2 November 2011 Action Plan of the League of Arab States, and its decisions of 22 January and 12 February 2012, without delay, stop all violence and protect its people, release all those detained during the unrest, withdraw all armed forces from cities and towns, guarantee peaceful demonstrations and allow unhindered access for Arab League monitors and international media. The language of the resolution closely mirrored that of a text vetoed by China and the Russian Federation in the Security Council two weeks earlier. (See Press Release SC/10536) The Assembly’s action also followed a special briefing on Monday by Navi Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who expressed outrage at the bloody 11-month crackdown on opposition protesters. She warned that the Council’s failure to take action had emboldened the Syrian Government to launch an all-out assault to crush dissent, most evident in its “appalling” siege of the city of Homs. (See Press Release GA/11206) By other terms of the text adopted today, the Assembly expressed its full support for the Arab League’s decision to facilitate a Syrian-led political transition to a democratic, pluralistic political system, including through a “serious political dialogue between the [Syrian Government] and the whole spectrum of the Syrian opposition”. Reaffirming its strong commitment to Syria’s sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, it further reaffirmed that all Member States “should refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State”. The measure requested Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and all relevant United Nations bodies to support the Arab League’s ongoing efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully, including through good offices and the appointment of a Special Envoy. The Secretary-General was also requested to report to the Assembly within 15 days on the status of the resolution. Ahead of the action, the Secretariat announced that approval of those elements of the text would incur $900,000 in additional budgetary resources for an initial six months of the 2012-2013 biennium. Egypt’s representative, presenting the draft resolution on behalf of the Arab Group, described the situation in Syria as “critical” and demanded that the Government immediately end the bloodshed. He said the text was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict. Stressing that the Arab League’s efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he expressed hope that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with “one voice” on events in Syria. Syria’s representative took the floor immediately thereafter in response to the points raised by his Egyptian counterpart, and said that the Government was responding in an accelerated manner to demands for reform. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments, in line with popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and to end the violence. However, Member States must stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria, he emphasized, declaring that no State would tolerate the presence of armed terrorists on its territory. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting such armed groups, even as they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. “Stop adding fuel to the fire,” he said, pointing out that the resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate itself from armed groups “says everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did its failure to condemn terrorist acts. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” Speaking after the vote, in a statement directed largely at the Arab League, he said that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today, as the Western co-sponsors of the resolution had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the League — “broken politically and morally” — had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Most other delegations hailed the resolution’s strong calls for an end to the violence and for the Syrian Government to protect civilians. Many reiterated their firm belief that the Arab League’s Action Plan, which proposed a negotiated solution among all Syrian factions, was the best path out of the crisis. Other speakers expressed grave concern about reports of massive human rights violations in Syria, and said that ending them must be the international community’s main priority. Costa Rica’s representative, who voted in favour of the resolution, emphasized that impunity must not be tolerated and, if necessary, the situation should be referred to the International Criminal Court. At the same time, several speakers echoed the concerns raised by the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, who voted against the text and roundly denounced “attempts by imperial Powers and their allies” to trigger regime change in Syria, “even at the cost of further bloodshed”. The text represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he added. He was also among those who commended the Russian Federation’s efforts to produce a more balanced text, by placing demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups, expressing support for that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus. China’s representative expressed support for the Arab League’s position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Yet, the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he stressed, adding that actions taken by the United Nations should not complicate matters, but be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. In other action, the Assembly decided that the Marshall Islands, Sudan and the Federated States of Micronesia had all made the payments necessary to reduce their arrears under Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Under that Article, a Member State in arrears cannot vote in the General Assembly “if the amount of the arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two years”. Also speaking in explanation of position were representatives of Venezuela, Grenada, Russian Federation, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Iran, Bolivia, Argentina, India, Singapore, Viet Nam, Chile, Bangladesh and Egypt. The General Assembly will reconvene at a time and date to be announced. Background Meeting this afternoon to consider matters relating to the prevention of armed conflict, the General Assembly was expected to take action on a draft resolution on the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36). Procedural Matters The representative of Syria, recalling the Assembly’s previous meeting on the report of the Human Rights Council, said his delegation had informed Member States at the time that the earlier meeting contravened the rules of procedure, and had called on the Assembly President to obtain a legal opinion on the matter. It had been announced during that meeting that a draft resolution on Syria would be presented to the Assembly, but today it was meeting under the item “Prevention of armed conflict”. It was “pathetic” that the Syrian issue was being addressed under at least three different agenda items, he said, adding that there was clearly confusion over the matter. The Assembly’s legitimacy was at stake, he said, asking the President to provide the rules of procedure governing the current meeting. GARY FRANCIS QUINLAN (Australia), Assembly Vice-President, responded by saying it was his understanding that the Assembly President could convene a meeting at any time, under any agenda item, to consider a draft resolution presented to Member States. The representative of Yemen said his delegation had been surprised by reference to Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Action on Draft Resolution OSAMA ABDELKHALEK MAHMOUD (Egypt), introducing the draft resolution the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36) on behalf of the Arab Group, said the Assembly was meeting as that country faced “critical circumstances”. The major escalation of violence there had been condemned by the League of Arab States, the Arab Group, the United Nations and the wider international community. Demanding that the Syrian Government end the bloodshed, he said the matter was at the very top of the Arab League’s agenda. That regional body had called for an immediate and faithful implementation of the Arab Action Plan as the only way to meet the aspirations of the Syrian people, he said, stressing the primacy of the Arab solution, under the “Arab roof”, and its rejection of military intervention. The draft before the Assembly was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict, he continued. It reaffirmed Syria’s territorial integrity and supported the aims set out in the decisions and resolutions of the Arab League. Stressing that those efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he said more than 70 Member States were co-sponsoring the draft, and it was to be hoped that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with one voice on events taking place in Syria. Hopefully, the vote would also show broad and commanding support for the Arab Action Plan, he added, calling on all Member States to stand shoulder to shoulder with each other and the Syrian people by voting in favour of the text. Following that statement, the Secretariat announced that approval of the text, which requested the Secretary-General and all relevant bodies to support the Arab League’s efforts, including through good offices and by appointing a Special Envoy, would incur additional budgetary resources in the amount of $900,000 for an initial six months in the 2012-2013 biennium. Those requirements would be met through the use of commitment authority granted to the Secretary-General as related to the maintenance of international peace and security. Speaking in explanation of position, the representative of Syria said his country continued to respond in an accelerated manner to demands for reform, in response to all the points raised by Egypt’s representative in presenting the draft resolution. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments that responded to popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and prestige and to end the violence. He called on all Member States to encourage the opposition to take part in that dialogue and not to impede participation by others. In addition, he called on Member States to stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria. No country could tolerate the presence of armed terrorist groups on its territory, he emphasized. Neither would it tolerate attacks against its officials, people and institutions. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting the armed groups, even though they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. They had also cut relations with Syria without justification, which showed that they did not wish to promote peaceful reform. He called on them to stop adding fuel to the fire, pointing out that the draft resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate themselves from armed groups “said everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did their failure to condemn terrorist acts. They had paid no heed to Syria’s plans for reforms, he added. The Arab League, in its resolution supported by today’s draft, had decided to provide all forms of support to the opposition, opening the door to the funding and arming of violent groups for terrorist acts, he said. The League was providing support to countries that had long wanted to undermine Syria, and Member States should instead help Syria’s Government and people to face the challenges of extremism and terrorism, which had been documented, but not well publicized. Adopting the draft resolution would only lead to a worsening of the crisis by encouraging extremism, he warned, appealing to all Member States to vote against the text lest they increase the chaos in Syria. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” It would also play into the hands of Israel and help its efforts to defeat the aspirations of Palestinians and other people under occupation in the region. The representative of Venezuela, affirming the fundamental importance of sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, denounced the attempt by imperial powers and their allies to trigger regime change in Syria, even at the cost of further bloodshed, reproducing the dire consequences of the Libyan situation. Those Powers sought to occupy Syria, to foment a coup against its legitimate authorities and to turn the country into a protectorate. The draft resolution, with its mentoring and monitoring mechanisms, represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he said. The text also attacked the Government for human rights abuses while hiding the heinous crimes committed by terrorist groups against civilians, as well as attacks with varied weaponry against public officials and facilities. He went on to note that the draft ignored the Government’s initiatives to promote inclusive political dialogue and its call for a referendum on a new Constitution, which were the best options for moving forward. The draft denied the Syrian State’s right to protect its population and ensure internal peace and security, he said, adding that it did not call for opposition groups to dissociate themselves from groups engaged in violence. Commending the Russian Federation’s efforts for a more balanced text, he supported that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus as well its efforts, with China, to prevent the Security Council from being used to violate Syria’s sovereignty. “It is not desirable that the logic of war, which imperialists intend to impose on Syria and the world, prevails,” he said. Instead, the Assembly should be concerned about recognition of a Palestinian State, the end of Israeli rights violations and ending the blockade on Cuba. The representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea said that any issue relating to a Member State must be discussed in line with the principles of territorial integrity and State sovereignty. As a full-fledged member of the United Nations, Syria was no exception to that rule, he said, emphasizing that all violence in Syria must stop. The issues in that country should be settled in the best interest of its people. The country’s fate and future should be in their hands and they alone should lead the process towards a peaceful negotiated solution, which should be reached without outside influence. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would vote against the text, he said. The representative of Grenada offered condolences to the families of all those who had lost loved ones in Syria and stressed that the United Nations must act — and be seen to act — in line with the tenets of its founding Charter. Grenada was proceeding with the understanding that the draft resolution would “do only what the text says” — provide diplomatic support to Syria, the Arab League and the Secretary-General in order to help the Government and people of Syria to end all bloodshed, while finding an agreed solution. It also understood that the Assembly was not voting on or for a text that could in any way be interpreted as a basis for the removal of the Government, military intervention or any act against the spirit and letter of the Charter, she said. With that understanding, Grenada would vote in favour of the draft resolution, she added. The Assembly then adopted the resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions. The representatives of Burundi, Kyrgyzstan and Comoros informed the Secretariat that they had been unable to cast their votes properly. The representative of the Russian Federation said he had opposed the resolution because it clearly did not meet the criteria for ending the violence in Syria. The Russian delegation had proposed to place reasonable demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups and to demand that those groups themselves stop their attacks, he said, noting that those amendments had not been accepted. The Russian Federation would continue to work with all those striving for regional stability, he stressed. The representative of China said his Government had closely followed developments in Syria and was deeply worried about the escalating crisis that had caused civilian casualties and affected peace and security in the wider Middle East. China condemned all acts of violence against innocent civilians and urged the Syrian Government as well as all political factions to “immediately and fully” end all acts of violence and quickly restore order. It also called on the political factions in Syria to express their political aspirations through non-violent means under the rule of law. He went on to urge all parties concerned immediately to launch an inclusive political dialogue, without preconditions, hold a referendum on the new draft Constitution, as well as early parliamentary elections, and establish a national unity Government that included all factions. “We understand the concern of Arab countries and the League of Arab States on seeking a quick resolution to this issue,” he said, expressing support for their position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Emphasizing that the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he said: “We do not approve of armed intervention or forcing a so-called regime change in Syria.” Neither did China believe that sanctions or the threat of such measures would be helpful in achieving an appropriate solution, he continued. The actions of the United Nations and the wider international community should be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. Instead of complicating matters, such actions should promote the maintenance of peace and stability in the Middle East, he said, adding that he had voted in accordance with those principles. As a friend of the Arab people, China had always followed the purposes and principles of the Charter and would continue to work with the international community to resolve the situation in Syria. The representative of Serbia said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that all international efforts should aim solely for an end to the suffering of the Syrian people. At the same time, Serbia would have wished that the proposals and amendments put forward by some delegations had been considered and evaluated. In particular, the resolution would have been enriched by some of the changes submitted by the Russian Federation, which were “truly constructive”, he said, adding that they could have led to the consensus adoption of the text. He expressed hope that the international community would nevertheless take notice of those proposed amendments as the diplomatic process progressed. “Their content cannot be avoided, and sooner or later will need to be addressed,” he said. The representative of Pakistan said he supported the Arab League position and had voted in favour of the resolution, but condemned the use of violence on all sides. An immediate end to violence and killing, as well as a peaceful resolution were aims upon which all Member States agreed. In that light, Pakistan had been stressing the need for consensus on the Syrian situation, he said, noting that there could have been better efforts in the Assembly and the Security Council to reach consensus and to fully assure delegations that there was no intention to carry out a hostile intervention. Reiterating his call for the Syrian people to be respected, he said they must be allowed to resolve their crisis, and he reaffirmed the absolute importance of respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of all States. The representative of Costa Rica expressed his delegation’s deepest concern about the gruesome human rights violations being carried out in Syria. The international community could not remain silent, he stressed, calling on the Syrian authorities to definitively end attacks against civilians and other human rights violations. Condemning reports of sexual violence, including that perpetrated against girls and boys, he said all international stakeholders should work towards a swift and peaceful solution to the crisis, in line with the Arab League’s Plan of Action. The Human Rights Council had been playing its role of promoting a peaceful solution and, with the appropriate tools already at its disposal, it should move to create the position of Special Rapporteur on the situation in Syria, he said, calling attention to that Council’s report on the very serious acts — pointing to possible crimes against humanity — being carried out in Syria. Expressing concern that the Security Council had been unable to act on the matter, he said it had been prevented from acting by the use of a veto. The Council required deep reform, chiefly so that such measures could not be used to stymie action in the face of the worst international crimes, he emphasized. Stakeholders might disagree on certain matters, but the international community must speak resoundingly when human rights violations and acts of violence against civilians were committed. The international community should explore all avenues to reach a solution and ensure that those who had committed grave crimes were held responsible, including through referring the Syrian issue to the International Criminal Court. Finally, he said the “voices of change cannot be silenced with violence”, and called for a solution that met the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people. The representative of Ukraine said that the Arab League’s peaceful efforts for a negotiated settlement deserved the Assembly’s support. Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs had issued a statement last week in which it had expressed grave concern at the escalating violence in Syria, “which threatens to grow into a full-scale civil war, with unpredictable consequences in the entire Middle East”. Ukraine urged all parties in Syria to cease the violence and begin a dialogue, with the aim of finding a mutually acceptable and effective way to resolve their differences. The representative of Iran said he had voted against the resolution, in line with his delegation’s position that the Syrian people’s legitimate demands must be addressed through a peaceful and domestically led political process and without foreign intervention in the country’s internal affairs, which would only worsen the crisis and have ramifications on the region as a whole. He regretted, in addition, that the Assembly’s consideration of the Syrian crisis had not followed proper procedure, including the vote under the agenda item “prevention of armed conflict”, which did not apply. It was even more regrettable, he continued, that the resolution’s co-sponsors had chosen not to accommodate any amendments that might have made it more balanced, comprehensive and suited to the real situation on the ground. In that light, it was necessary to be clear and steadfast in condemning any act of violence and terrorism, in any form and manifestation, he emphasized. As long as armed groups continued to resort to violence, the crisis would continue, serving the interests of the Zionist regime. All States must work together in a practical manner to assist a peaceful resolution of the crisis. The representative of Bolivia, stating that he had voted against the resolution, asked the Assembly to consider exactly what was happening in Syria. With the many possibilities and few answers, it was clear that no one really knew exactly what the real situation was. All that was known was that there was a recognized opposition and a Government that was prepared to undertake meaningful reforms. Indeed, Syria’s representative had twice informed the Assembly that such reforms, including constitutional changes, had been agreed and were under way. Saying he understood that such reforms were a work in progress, he added that Bolivia knew the dangers of a political vacuum, which could lead to destabilization of the entire region. He said there were two possible ways in which the Syrian situation could end, the first being “the way of Libya”, in which the United Nations had facilitated a “recipe for intervention” to justify regime change through a Security Council resolution. That text had actually promoted further destabilization and civil unrest, he pointed out, warning: “I fear we have not learned our lessons from that situation.” He added: “Last year, it was the Security Council and this year it appears to be the General Assembly.” Bolivia seriously hoped that that was not the case, but had voted against the resolution just the same. The other possible ending was through a peaceful resolution, as had occurred in Egypt and Tunisia, he said. In those cases, efforts had been channelled towards democracy and changes of Government borne by the will of the people, not foreign intervention. Hopefully, the winds of the “Arab Spring” would blow in Syria’s direction and stir peaceful change, he said, adding that, had the amendments put forward by the Russian Federation been integrated into the resolution, it would have been adopted by consensus. The representative of Argentina said he had voted in favour of the resolution and emphasized the utmost importance of ensuring the protection and promotion of human rights in Syria. It was necessary to preserve the fundamental rights of free association and expression, he said, adding that the crisis in Syria should be resolved through dialogue and democratic negotiations involving all sectors of society. The representative of India noted that his country had condemned all violence in Syria, no matter by whom it was committed, and had been supporting a peaceful, inclusive and nationally led political resolution of the crisis. India had voted in favour of the resolution, in accordance with its support for the Arab League’s efforts for such a political resolution. Regrettably, however, there had been exceptions to established General Assembly procedures during the week, he said, expressing a wish that there had been greater readiness from all quarters to negotiate a text with a view to reaching consensus. He went on to note that the resolution expressly reaffirmed that all countries should refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State. It condemned all violence, irrespective of its origin, and called for serious political dialogue under the Arab League. The country’s leadership was a matter for the Syrian people to decide, he stressed, calling on all opposition forces to engage peacefully in constructive dialogue with the authorities. In that connection, he noted the Syrian leadership’s decision to hold a referendum and multi-party elections, expressing hope that that decision would create an environment of peace and facilitate a political process. The representative of Singapore said he had voted in favour of the resolution because it was not a politically motivated text, but instead dealt with a unique emergency in an appropriate manner. He joined with all in calling on all stakeholders to end violence and resolve the situation peacefully. The representative of Viet Nam, affirming his country’s concern about developments in Syria, joined the call for all parties in Syria to exercise self-restraint, end the violence and find a political solution through a domestically led constructive dialogue and national reconciliation, in conformity with the people’s aspirations. He also underlined the importance of respecting the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of States. Viet Nam supported efforts by the international community, including the Arab League, to contribute constructively to the restoration of stability and the promotion of national reconciliation in Syria, he said. The representative of Chile said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that the Assembly had raised its voice to “energetically” condemn the “grave and massive” violations of human rights under way in Syria. Serious acts, such as torture, sexual violence and arbitrary detention, including those highlighted by the High Commissioner for Human Rights in her briefing earlier in the week, must be denounced and those responsible brought to justice, he emphasized. All parties in Syria must open a true dialogue, and the authorities must allow access to those in need, he added. The representative of Bangladesh said he had voted in favour of the resolution. Despite its principled position of abstaining when texts targeted human rights situations in specific countries, Bangladesh had voted in favour of today’s resolution to end the shedding of the Syrian people’s blood, he said. The Assembly’s decision earlier in the week to consider the report of the Human Rights Council had contravened its rules of procedure, he said, expressing hope that no precedent would result from that action. The resolution had been drafted in line with the aims of the Arab League Action Plan, but Bangladesh would have hoped for the inclusion of the amendments submitted by the Russian Federation, he said, emphasizing that any actions taken in Syria must be in line with the aspirations of its people and lead towards a peaceful resolution. The representative of Egypt then made a general statement, saying that the international community had made its views known through its overwhelming support for the resolution. It had reaffirmed the need for a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis and sent a clear message to the Government to listen to the voice of the Syrian people and implement the decisions of the Arab League. The situation was deteriorating and all should now focus on ending the violence and meeting the people’s aspirations in order to avoid a worse situation, which would have effects in the region and lead to a humanitarian crisis. Egypt would continue to work with the League in that effort, he pledged. The representative of Syria also made a general statement, saying that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today as the resolution’s Western co-sponsors had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the Arab League had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Syria had left the Arab League temporarily; it was broken, politically and morally, he said, congratulating it on its new alliance with Israel. Syria no longer wanted the League to stand by it following its shameful actions, but it did want them to save whatever face it had left and cease the plotting against other Arab States. He went on to warn that the wealth of all the Gulf Cooperation Council countries would be squandered on losing causes and the price would be borne by all Arabs, who would be used as fuel to obtain the objectives of Israel and the West. Had the co-sponsors retained any credibility, they would have accepted the Russian amendments and worked to counter support for armed groups in Syria. In addition, the United Nations was betraying its own principles, and if that continued, the Organization would collapse, destroying the normative efforts of the past 66 years, he said. That would be the end result of intervention in the internal affairs of others. * *** * For information media • not an official record http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/ga11207.doc.htm ----------------------------------------------------------- Source: Name: United Nations Webcast Website: www.unmultimedia.org Country: United States of America ----------------------------------------------------------
133 mois0 -
30 min 00
Syria: 3 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012
Syria: 3 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012 Prevention of armed conflict: draft resolution (A/66/L.36) [34] The General Assembly strongly condemned the continued “widespread and systematic” human rights violations by the Syrian authorities and demanded that the Government immediately cease all violence and protect its people. The 193-member body adopted a resolution backing Arab League efforts to resolve the crisis in Syria, where UN officials estimate that security forces have killed well over 5,400 people since the popular uprising began last March. http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/02/97th-plenary-meeting-general-assembly.html 16 February 2012 General Assembly GA/11207 Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York Sixty-sixth General Assembly Plenary 97th Meeting (PM) General Assembly Adopts Resolution Strongly Condemning ‘Widespread and Systematic’ Human Rights Violations by Syrian Authorities Text Passes by 137 Votes in Favour to 12 against, with 17 Abstentions Strongly condemning continued widespread and systematic human rights violations by the Syrian authorities, the General Assembly today voted overwhelmingly to call on both the Government and allied forces and armed groups “to stop all violence or reprisals immediately”. Adopting an Arab-backed resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions, the Assembly expressed grave concern at the deteriorating situation in Syria, and condemned a raft of violations carried out by the authorities, such as the use of force against civilians, the killing and persecution of protestors and journalists, and sexual violence and ill-treatment, including against children. The Assembly called on Syria to abide by its obligations under international law, and demanded that the Government, in line with the 2 November 2011 Action Plan of the League of Arab States, and its decisions of 22 January and 12 February 2012, without delay, stop all violence and protect its people, release all those detained during the unrest, withdraw all armed forces from cities and towns, guarantee peaceful demonstrations and allow unhindered access for Arab League monitors and international media. The language of the resolution closely mirrored that of a text vetoed by China and the Russian Federation in the Security Council two weeks earlier. (See Press Release SC/10536) The Assembly’s action also followed a special briefing on Monday by Navi Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who expressed outrage at the bloody 11-month crackdown on opposition protesters. She warned that the Council’s failure to take action had emboldened the Syrian Government to launch an all-out assault to crush dissent, most evident in its “appalling” siege of the city of Homs. (See Press Release GA/11206) By other terms of the text adopted today, the Assembly expressed its full support for the Arab League’s decision to facilitate a Syrian-led political transition to a democratic, pluralistic political system, including through a “serious political dialogue between the [Syrian Government] and the whole spectrum of the Syrian opposition”. Reaffirming its strong commitment to Syria’s sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, it further reaffirmed that all Member States “should refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State”. The measure requested Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and all relevant United Nations bodies to support the Arab League’s ongoing efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully, including through good offices and the appointment of a Special Envoy. The Secretary-General was also requested to report to the Assembly within 15 days on the status of the resolution. Ahead of the action, the Secretariat announced that approval of those elements of the text would incur $900,000 in additional budgetary resources for an initial six months of the 2012-2013 biennium. Egypt’s representative, presenting the draft resolution on behalf of the Arab Group, described the situation in Syria as “critical” and demanded that the Government immediately end the bloodshed. He said the text was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict. Stressing that the Arab League’s efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he expressed hope that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with “one voice” on events in Syria. Syria’s representative took the floor immediately thereafter in response to the points raised by his Egyptian counterpart, and said that the Government was responding in an accelerated manner to demands for reform. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments, in line with popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and to end the violence. However, Member States must stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria, he emphasized, declaring that no State would tolerate the presence of armed terrorists on its territory. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting such armed groups, even as they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. “Stop adding fuel to the fire,” he said, pointing out that the resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate itself from armed groups “says everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did its failure to condemn terrorist acts. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” Speaking after the vote, in a statement directed largely at the Arab League, he said that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today, as the Western co-sponsors of the resolution had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the League — “broken politically and morally” — had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Most other delegations hailed the resolution’s strong calls for an end to the violence and for the Syrian Government to protect civilians. Many reiterated their firm belief that the Arab League’s Action Plan, which proposed a negotiated solution among all Syrian factions, was the best path out of the crisis. Other speakers expressed grave concern about reports of massive human rights violations in Syria, and said that ending them must be the international community’s main priority. Costa Rica’s representative, who voted in favour of the resolution, emphasized that impunity must not be tolerated and, if necessary, the situation should be referred to the International Criminal Court. At the same time, several speakers echoed the concerns raised by the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, who voted against the text and roundly denounced “attempts by imperial Powers and their allies” to trigger regime change in Syria, “even at the cost of further bloodshed”. The text represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he added. He was also among those who commended the Russian Federation’s efforts to produce a more balanced text, by placing demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups, expressing support for that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus. China’s representative expressed support for the Arab League’s position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Yet, the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he stressed, adding that actions taken by the United Nations should not complicate matters, but be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. In other action, the Assembly decided that the Marshall Islands, Sudan and the Federated States of Micronesia had all made the payments necessary to reduce their arrears under Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Under that Article, a Member State in arrears cannot vote in the General Assembly “if the amount of the arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two years”. Also speaking in explanation of position were representatives of Venezuela, Grenada, Russian Federation, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Iran, Bolivia, Argentina, India, Singapore, Viet Nam, Chile, Bangladesh and Egypt. The General Assembly will reconvene at a time and date to be announced. Background Meeting this afternoon to consider matters relating to the prevention of armed conflict, the General Assembly was expected to take action on a draft resolution on the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36). Procedural Matters The representative of Syria, recalling the Assembly’s previous meeting on the report of the Human Rights Council, said his delegation had informed Member States at the time that the earlier meeting contravened the rules of procedure, and had called on the Assembly President to obtain a legal opinion on the matter. It had been announced during that meeting that a draft resolution on Syria would be presented to the Assembly, but today it was meeting under the item “Prevention of armed conflict”. It was “pathetic” that the Syrian issue was being addressed under at least three different agenda items, he said, adding that there was clearly confusion over the matter. The Assembly’s legitimacy was at stake, he said, asking the President to provide the rules of procedure governing the current meeting. GARY FRANCIS QUINLAN (Australia), Assembly Vice-President, responded by saying it was his understanding that the Assembly President could convene a meeting at any time, under any agenda item, to consider a draft resolution presented to Member States. The representative of Yemen said his delegation had been surprised by reference to Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Action on Draft Resolution OSAMA ABDELKHALEK MAHMOUD (Egypt), introducing the draft resolution the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36) on behalf of the Arab Group, said the Assembly was meeting as that country faced “critical circumstances”. The major escalation of violence there had been condemned by the League of Arab States, the Arab Group, the United Nations and the wider international community. Demanding that the Syrian Government end the bloodshed, he said the matter was at the very top of the Arab League’s agenda. That regional body had called for an immediate and faithful implementation of the Arab Action Plan as the only way to meet the aspirations of the Syrian people, he said, stressing the primacy of the Arab solution, under the “Arab roof”, and its rejection of military intervention. The draft before the Assembly was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict, he continued. It reaffirmed Syria’s territorial integrity and supported the aims set out in the decisions and resolutions of the Arab League. Stressing that those efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he said more than 70 Member States were co-sponsoring the draft, and it was to be hoped that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with one voice on events taking place in Syria. Hopefully, the vote would also show broad and commanding support for the Arab Action Plan, he added, calling on all Member States to stand shoulder to shoulder with each other and the Syrian people by voting in favour of the text. Following that statement, the Secretariat announced that approval of the text, which requested the Secretary-General and all relevant bodies to support the Arab League’s efforts, including through good offices and by appointing a Special Envoy, would incur additional budgetary resources in the amount of $900,000 for an initial six months in the 2012-2013 biennium. Those requirements would be met through the use of commitment authority granted to the Secretary-General as related to the maintenance of international peace and security. Speaking in explanation of position, the representative of Syria said his country continued to respond in an accelerated manner to demands for reform, in response to all the points raised by Egypt’s representative in presenting the draft resolution. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments that responded to popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and prestige and to end the violence. He called on all Member States to encourage the opposition to take part in that dialogue and not to impede participation by others. In addition, he called on Member States to stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria. No country could tolerate the presence of armed terrorist groups on its territory, he emphasized. Neither would it tolerate attacks against its officials, people and institutions. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting the armed groups, even though they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. They had also cut relations with Syria without justification, which showed that they did not wish to promote peaceful reform. He called on them to stop adding fuel to the fire, pointing out that the draft resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate themselves from armed groups “said everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did their failure to condemn terrorist acts. They had paid no heed to Syria’s plans for reforms, he added. The Arab League, in its resolution supported by today’s draft, had decided to provide all forms of support to the opposition, opening the door to the funding and arming of violent groups for terrorist acts, he said. The League was providing support to countries that had long wanted to undermine Syria, and Member States should instead help Syria’s Government and people to face the challenges of extremism and terrorism, which had been documented, but not well publicized. Adopting the draft resolution would only lead to a worsening of the crisis by encouraging extremism, he warned, appealing to all Member States to vote against the text lest they increase the chaos in Syria. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” It would also play into the hands of Israel and help its efforts to defeat the aspirations of Palestinians and other people under occupation in the region. The representative of Venezuela, affirming the fundamental importance of sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, denounced the attempt by imperial powers and their allies to trigger regime change in Syria, even at the cost of further bloodshed, reproducing the dire consequences of the Libyan situation. Those Powers sought to occupy Syria, to foment a coup against its legitimate authorities and to turn the country into a protectorate. The draft resolution, with its mentoring and monitoring mechanisms, represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he said. The text also attacked the Government for human rights abuses while hiding the heinous crimes committed by terrorist groups against civilians, as well as attacks with varied weaponry against public officials and facilities. He went on to note that the draft ignored the Government’s initiatives to promote inclusive political dialogue and its call for a referendum on a new Constitution, which were the best options for moving forward. The draft denied the Syrian State’s right to protect its population and ensure internal peace and security, he said, adding that it did not call for opposition groups to dissociate themselves from groups engaged in violence. Commending the Russian Federation’s efforts for a more balanced text, he supported that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus as well its efforts, with China, to prevent the Security Council from being used to violate Syria’s sovereignty. “It is not desirable that the logic of war, which imperialists intend to impose on Syria and the world, prevails,” he said. Instead, the Assembly should be concerned about recognition of a Palestinian State, the end of Israeli rights violations and ending the blockade on Cuba. The representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea said that any issue relating to a Member State must be discussed in line with the principles of territorial integrity and State sovereignty. As a full-fledged member of the United Nations, Syria was no exception to that rule, he said, emphasizing that all violence in Syria must stop. The issues in that country should be settled in the best interest of its people. The country’s fate and future should be in their hands and they alone should lead the process towards a peaceful negotiated solution, which should be reached without outside influence. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would vote against the text, he said. The representative of Grenada offered condolences to the families of all those who had lost loved ones in Syria and stressed that the United Nations must act — and be seen to act — in line with the tenets of its founding Charter. Grenada was proceeding with the understanding that the draft resolution would “do only what the text says” — provide diplomatic support to Syria, the Arab League and the Secretary-General in order to help the Government and people of Syria to end all bloodshed, while finding an agreed solution. It also understood that the Assembly was not voting on or for a text that could in any way be interpreted as a basis for the removal of the Government, military intervention or any act against the spirit and letter of the Charter, she said. With that understanding, Grenada would vote in favour of the draft resolution, she added. The Assembly then adopted the resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions. The representatives of Burundi, Kyrgyzstan and Comoros informed the Secretariat that they had been unable to cast their votes properly. The representative of the Russian Federation said he had opposed the resolution because it clearly did not meet the criteria for ending the violence in Syria. The Russian delegation had proposed to place reasonable demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups and to demand that those groups themselves stop their attacks, he said, noting that those amendments had not been accepted. The Russian Federation would continue to work with all those striving for regional stability, he stressed. The representative of China said his Government had closely followed developments in Syria and was deeply worried about the escalating crisis that had caused civilian casualties and affected peace and security in the wider Middle East. China condemned all acts of violence against innocent civilians and urged the Syrian Government as well as all political factions to “immediately and fully” end all acts of violence and quickly restore order. It also called on the political factions in Syria to express their political aspirations through non-violent means under the rule of law. He went on to urge all parties concerned immediately to launch an inclusive political dialogue, without preconditions, hold a referendum on the new draft Constitution, as well as early parliamentary elections, and establish a national unity Government that included all factions. “We understand the concern of Arab countries and the League of Arab States on seeking a quick resolution to this issue,” he said, expressing support for their position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Emphasizing that the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he said: “We do not approve of armed intervention or forcing a so-called regime change in Syria.” Neither did China believe that sanctions or the threat of such measures would be helpful in achieving an appropriate solution, he continued. The actions of the United Nations and the wider international community should be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. Instead of complicating matters, such actions should promote the maintenance of peace and stability in the Middle East, he said, adding that he had voted in accordance with those principles. As a friend of the Arab people, China had always followed the purposes and principles of the Charter and would continue to work with the international community to resolve the situation in Syria. The representative of Serbia said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that all international efforts should aim solely for an end to the suffering of the Syrian people. At the same time, Serbia would have wished that the proposals and amendments put forward by some delegations had been considered and evaluated. In particular, the resolution would have been enriched by some of the changes submitted by the Russian Federation, which were “truly constructive”, he said, adding that they could have led to the consensus adoption of the text. He expressed hope that the international community would nevertheless take notice of those proposed amendments as the diplomatic process progressed. “Their content cannot be avoided, and sooner or later will need to be addressed,” he said. The representative of Pakistan said he supported the Arab League position and had voted in favour of the resolution, but condemned the use of violence on all sides. An immediate end to violence and killing, as well as a peaceful resolution were aims upon which all Member States agreed. In that light, Pakistan had been stressing the need for consensus on the Syrian situation, he said, noting that there could have been better efforts in the Assembly and the Security Council to reach consensus and to fully assure delegations that there was no intention to carry out a hostile intervention. Reiterating his call for the Syrian people to be respected, he said they must be allowed to resolve their crisis, and he reaffirmed the absolute importance of respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of all States. The representative of Costa Rica expressed his delegation’s deepest concern about the gruesome human rights violations being carried out in Syria. The international community could not remain silent, he stressed, calling on the Syrian authorities to definitively end attacks against civilians and other human rights violations. Condemning reports of sexual violence, including that perpetrated against girls and boys, he said all international stakeholders should work towards a swift and peaceful solution to the crisis, in line with the Arab League’s Plan of Action. The Human Rights Council had been playing its role of promoting a peaceful solution and, with the appropriate tools already at its disposal, it should move to create the position of Special Rapporteur on the situation in Syria, he said, calling attention to that Council’s report on the very serious acts — pointing to possible crimes against humanity — being carried out in Syria. Expressing concern that the Security Council had been unable to act on the matter, he said it had been prevented from acting by the use of a veto. The Council required deep reform, chiefly so that such measures could not be used to stymie action in the face of the worst international crimes, he emphasized. Stakeholders might disagree on certain matters, but the international community must speak resoundingly when human rights violations and acts of violence against civilians were committed. The international community should explore all avenues to reach a solution and ensure that those who had committed grave crimes were held responsible, including through referring the Syrian issue to the International Criminal Court. Finally, he said the “voices of change cannot be silenced with violence”, and called for a solution that met the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people. The representative of Ukraine said that the Arab League’s peaceful efforts for a negotiated settlement deserved the Assembly’s support. Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs had issued a statement last week in which it had expressed grave concern at the escalating violence in Syria, “which threatens to grow into a full-scale civil war, with unpredictable consequences in the entire Middle East”. Ukraine urged all parties in Syria to cease the violence and begin a dialogue, with the aim of finding a mutually acceptable and effective way to resolve their differences. The representative of Iran said he had voted against the resolution, in line with his delegation’s position that the Syrian people’s legitimate demands must be addressed through a peaceful and domestically led political process and without foreign intervention in the country’s internal affairs, which would only worsen the crisis and have ramifications on the region as a whole. He regretted, in addition, that the Assembly’s consideration of the Syrian crisis had not followed proper procedure, including the vote under the agenda item “prevention of armed conflict”, which did not apply. It was even more regrettable, he continued, that the resolution’s co-sponsors had chosen not to accommodate any amendments that might have made it more balanced, comprehensive and suited to the real situation on the ground. In that light, it was necessary to be clear and steadfast in condemning any act of violence and terrorism, in any form and manifestation, he emphasized. As long as armed groups continued to resort to violence, the crisis would continue, serving the interests of the Zionist regime. All States must work together in a practical manner to assist a peaceful resolution of the crisis. The representative of Bolivia, stating that he had voted against the resolution, asked the Assembly to consider exactly what was happening in Syria. With the many possibilities and few answers, it was clear that no one really knew exactly what the real situation was. All that was known was that there was a recognized opposition and a Government that was prepared to undertake meaningful reforms. Indeed, Syria’s representative had twice informed the Assembly that such reforms, including constitutional changes, had been agreed and were under way. Saying he understood that such reforms were a work in progress, he added that Bolivia knew the dangers of a political vacuum, which could lead to destabilization of the entire region. He said there were two possible ways in which the Syrian situation could end, the first being “the way of Libya”, in which the United Nations had facilitated a “recipe for intervention” to justify regime change through a Security Council resolution. That text had actually promoted further destabilization and civil unrest, he pointed out, warning: “I fear we have not learned our lessons from that situation.” He added: “Last year, it was the Security Council and this year it appears to be the General Assembly.” Bolivia seriously hoped that that was not the case, but had voted against the resolution just the same. The other possible ending was through a peaceful resolution, as had occurred in Egypt and Tunisia, he said. In those cases, efforts had been channelled towards democracy and changes of Government borne by the will of the people, not foreign intervention. Hopefully, the winds of the “Arab Spring” would blow in Syria’s direction and stir peaceful change, he said, adding that, had the amendments put forward by the Russian Federation been integrated into the resolution, it would have been adopted by consensus. The representative of Argentina said he had voted in favour of the resolution and emphasized the utmost importance of ensuring the protection and promotion of human rights in Syria. It was necessary to preserve the fundamental rights of free association and expression, he said, adding that the crisis in Syria should be resolved through dialogue and democratic negotiations involving all sectors of society. The representative of India noted that his country had condemned all violence in Syria, no matter by whom it was committed, and had been supporting a peaceful, inclusive and nationally led political resolution of the crisis. India had voted in favour of the resolution, in accordance with its support for the Arab League’s efforts for such a political resolution. Regrettably, however, there had been exceptions to established General Assembly procedures during the week, he said, expressing a wish that there had been greater readiness from all quarters to negotiate a text with a view to reaching consensus. He went on to note that the resolution expressly reaffirmed that all countries should refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State. It condemned all violence, irrespective of its origin, and called for serious political dialogue under the Arab League. The country’s leadership was a matter for the Syrian people to decide, he stressed, calling on all opposition forces to engage peacefully in constructive dialogue with the authorities. In that connection, he noted the Syrian leadership’s decision to hold a referendum and multi-party elections, expressing hope that that decision would create an environment of peace and facilitate a political process. The representative of Singapore said he had voted in favour of the resolution because it was not a politically motivated text, but instead dealt with a unique emergency in an appropriate manner. He joined with all in calling on all stakeholders to end violence and resolve the situation peacefully. The representative of Viet Nam, affirming his country’s concern about developments in Syria, joined the call for all parties in Syria to exercise self-restraint, end the violence and find a political solution through a domestically led constructive dialogue and national reconciliation, in conformity with the people’s aspirations. He also underlined the importance of respecting the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of States. Viet Nam supported efforts by the international community, including the Arab League, to contribute constructively to the restoration of stability and the promotion of national reconciliation in Syria, he said. The representative of Chile said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that the Assembly had raised its voice to “energetically” condemn the “grave and massive” violations of human rights under way in Syria. Serious acts, such as torture, sexual violence and arbitrary detention, including those highlighted by the High Commissioner for Human Rights in her briefing earlier in the week, must be denounced and those responsible brought to justice, he emphasized. All parties in Syria must open a true dialogue, and the authorities must allow access to those in need, he added. The representative of Bangladesh said he had voted in favour of the resolution. Despite its principled position of abstaining when texts targeted human rights situations in specific countries, Bangladesh had voted in favour of today’s resolution to end the shedding of the Syrian people’s blood, he said. The Assembly’s decision earlier in the week to consider the report of the Human Rights Council had contravened its rules of procedure, he said, expressing hope that no precedent would result from that action. The resolution had been drafted in line with the aims of the Arab League Action Plan, but Bangladesh would have hoped for the inclusion of the amendments submitted by the Russian Federation, he said, emphasizing that any actions taken in Syria must be in line with the aspirations of its people and lead towards a peaceful resolution. The representative of Egypt then made a general statement, saying that the international community had made its views known through its overwhelming support for the resolution. It had reaffirmed the need for a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis and sent a clear message to the Government to listen to the voice of the Syrian people and implement the decisions of the Arab League. The situation was deteriorating and all should now focus on ending the violence and meeting the people’s aspirations in order to avoid a worse situation, which would have effects in the region and lead to a humanitarian crisis. Egypt would continue to work with the League in that effort, he pledged. The representative of Syria also made a general statement, saying that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today as the resolution’s Western co-sponsors had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the Arab League had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Syria had left the Arab League temporarily; it was broken, politically and morally, he said, congratulating it on its new alliance with Israel. Syria no longer wanted the League to stand by it following its shameful actions, but it did want them to save whatever face it had left and cease the plotting against other Arab States. He went on to warn that the wealth of all the Gulf Cooperation Council countries would be squandered on losing causes and the price would be borne by all Arabs, who would be used as fuel to obtain the objectives of Israel and the West. Had the co-sponsors retained any credibility, they would have accepted the Russian amendments and worked to counter support for armed groups in Syria. In addition, the United Nations was betraying its own principles, and if that continued, the Organization would collapse, destroying the normative efforts of the past 66 years, he said. That would be the end result of intervention in the internal affairs of others. * *** * For information media • not an official record http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/ga11207.doc.htm ----------------------------------------------------------- Source: Name: United Nations Webcast Website: www.unmultimedia.org Country: United States of America ----------------------------------------------------------
73 mois0 -
30 min 00
Syria: 2 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012
Syria: 2 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012 Prevention of armed conflict: draft resolution (A/66/L.36) [34] The General Assembly strongly condemned the continued “widespread and systematic” human rights violations by the Syrian authorities and demanded that the Government immediately cease all violence and protect its people. The 193-member body adopted a resolution backing Arab League efforts to resolve the crisis in Syria, where UN officials estimate that security forces have killed well over 5,400 people since the popular uprising began last March. http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/02/97th-plenary-meeting-general-assembly.html 16 February 2012 General Assembly GA/11207 Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York Sixty-sixth General Assembly Plenary 97th Meeting (PM) General Assembly Adopts Resolution Strongly Condemning ‘Widespread and Systematic’ Human Rights Violations by Syrian Authorities Text Passes by 137 Votes in Favour to 12 against, with 17 Abstentions Strongly condemning continued widespread and systematic human rights violations by the Syrian authorities, the General Assembly today voted overwhelmingly to call on both the Government and allied forces and armed groups “to stop all violence or reprisals immediately”. Adopting an Arab-backed resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions, the Assembly expressed grave concern at the deteriorating situation in Syria, and condemned a raft of violations carried out by the authorities, such as the use of force against civilians, the killing and persecution of protestors and journalists, and sexual violence and ill-treatment, including against children. The Assembly called on Syria to abide by its obligations under international law, and demanded that the Government, in line with the 2 November 2011 Action Plan of the League of Arab States, and its decisions of 22 January and 12 February 2012, without delay, stop all violence and protect its people, release all those detained during the unrest, withdraw all armed forces from cities and towns, guarantee peaceful demonstrations and allow unhindered access for Arab League monitors and international media. The language of the resolution closely mirrored that of a text vetoed by China and the Russian Federation in the Security Council two weeks earlier. (See Press Release SC/10536) The Assembly’s action also followed a special briefing on Monday by Navi Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who expressed outrage at the bloody 11-month crackdown on opposition protesters. She warned that the Council’s failure to take action had emboldened the Syrian Government to launch an all-out assault to crush dissent, most evident in its “appalling” siege of the city of Homs. (See Press Release GA/11206) By other terms of the text adopted today, the Assembly expressed its full support for the Arab League’s decision to facilitate a Syrian-led political transition to a democratic, pluralistic political system, including through a “serious political dialogue between the [Syrian Government] and the whole spectrum of the Syrian opposition”. Reaffirming its strong commitment to Syria’s sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, it further reaffirmed that all Member States “should refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State”. The measure requested Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and all relevant United Nations bodies to support the Arab League’s ongoing efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully, including through good offices and the appointment of a Special Envoy. The Secretary-General was also requested to report to the Assembly within 15 days on the status of the resolution. Ahead of the action, the Secretariat announced that approval of those elements of the text would incur $900,000 in additional budgetary resources for an initial six months of the 2012-2013 biennium. Egypt’s representative, presenting the draft resolution on behalf of the Arab Group, described the situation in Syria as “critical” and demanded that the Government immediately end the bloodshed. He said the text was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict. Stressing that the Arab League’s efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he expressed hope that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with “one voice” on events in Syria. Syria’s representative took the floor immediately thereafter in response to the points raised by his Egyptian counterpart, and said that the Government was responding in an accelerated manner to demands for reform. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments, in line with popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and to end the violence. However, Member States must stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria, he emphasized, declaring that no State would tolerate the presence of armed terrorists on its territory. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting such armed groups, even as they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. “Stop adding fuel to the fire,” he said, pointing out that the resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate itself from armed groups “says everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did its failure to condemn terrorist acts. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” Speaking after the vote, in a statement directed largely at the Arab League, he said that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today, as the Western co-sponsors of the resolution had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the League — “broken politically and morally” — had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Most other delegations hailed the resolution’s strong calls for an end to the violence and for the Syrian Government to protect civilians. Many reiterated their firm belief that the Arab League’s Action Plan, which proposed a negotiated solution among all Syrian factions, was the best path out of the crisis. Other speakers expressed grave concern about reports of massive human rights violations in Syria, and said that ending them must be the international community’s main priority. Costa Rica’s representative, who voted in favour of the resolution, emphasized that impunity must not be tolerated and, if necessary, the situation should be referred to the International Criminal Court. At the same time, several speakers echoed the concerns raised by the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, who voted against the text and roundly denounced “attempts by imperial Powers and their allies” to trigger regime change in Syria, “even at the cost of further bloodshed”. The text represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he added. He was also among those who commended the Russian Federation’s efforts to produce a more balanced text, by placing demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups, expressing support for that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus. China’s representative expressed support for the Arab League’s position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Yet, the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he stressed, adding that actions taken by the United Nations should not complicate matters, but be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. In other action, the Assembly decided that the Marshall Islands, Sudan and the Federated States of Micronesia had all made the payments necessary to reduce their arrears under Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Under that Article, a Member State in arrears cannot vote in the General Assembly “if the amount of the arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two years”. Also speaking in explanation of position were representatives of Venezuela, Grenada, Russian Federation, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Iran, Bolivia, Argentina, India, Singapore, Viet Nam, Chile, Bangladesh and Egypt. The General Assembly will reconvene at a time and date to be announced. Background Meeting this afternoon to consider matters relating to the prevention of armed conflict, the General Assembly was expected to take action on a draft resolution on the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36). Procedural Matters The representative of Syria, recalling the Assembly’s previous meeting on the report of the Human Rights Council, said his delegation had informed Member States at the time that the earlier meeting contravened the rules of procedure, and had called on the Assembly President to obtain a legal opinion on the matter. It had been announced during that meeting that a draft resolution on Syria would be presented to the Assembly, but today it was meeting under the item “Prevention of armed conflict”. It was “pathetic” that the Syrian issue was being addressed under at least three different agenda items, he said, adding that there was clearly confusion over the matter. The Assembly’s legitimacy was at stake, he said, asking the President to provide the rules of procedure governing the current meeting. GARY FRANCIS QUINLAN (Australia), Assembly Vice-President, responded by saying it was his understanding that the Assembly President could convene a meeting at any time, under any agenda item, to consider a draft resolution presented to Member States. The representative of Yemen said his delegation had been surprised by reference to Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Action on Draft Resolution OSAMA ABDELKHALEK MAHMOUD (Egypt), introducing the draft resolution the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36) on behalf of the Arab Group, said the Assembly was meeting as that country faced “critical circumstances”. The major escalation of violence there had been condemned by the League of Arab States, the Arab Group, the United Nations and the wider international community. Demanding that the Syrian Government end the bloodshed, he said the matter was at the very top of the Arab League’s agenda. That regional body had called for an immediate and faithful implementation of the Arab Action Plan as the only way to meet the aspirations of the Syrian people, he said, stressing the primacy of the Arab solution, under the “Arab roof”, and its rejection of military intervention. The draft before the Assembly was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict, he continued. It reaffirmed Syria’s territorial integrity and supported the aims set out in the decisions and resolutions of the Arab League. Stressing that those efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he said more than 70 Member States were co-sponsoring the draft, and it was to be hoped that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with one voice on events taking place in Syria. Hopefully, the vote would also show broad and commanding support for the Arab Action Plan, he added, calling on all Member States to stand shoulder to shoulder with each other and the Syrian people by voting in favour of the text. Following that statement, the Secretariat announced that approval of the text, which requested the Secretary-General and all relevant bodies to support the Arab League’s efforts, including through good offices and by appointing a Special Envoy, would incur additional budgetary resources in the amount of $900,000 for an initial six months in the 2012-2013 biennium. Those requirements would be met through the use of commitment authority granted to the Secretary-General as related to the maintenance of international peace and security. Speaking in explanation of position, the representative of Syria said his country continued to respond in an accelerated manner to demands for reform, in response to all the points raised by Egypt’s representative in presenting the draft resolution. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments that responded to popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and prestige and to end the violence. He called on all Member States to encourage the opposition to take part in that dialogue and not to impede participation by others. In addition, he called on Member States to stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria. No country could tolerate the presence of armed terrorist groups on its territory, he emphasized. Neither would it tolerate attacks against its officials, people and institutions. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting the armed groups, even though they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. They had also cut relations with Syria without justification, which showed that they did not wish to promote peaceful reform. He called on them to stop adding fuel to the fire, pointing out that the draft resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate themselves from armed groups “said everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did their failure to condemn terrorist acts. They had paid no heed to Syria’s plans for reforms, he added. The Arab League, in its resolution supported by today’s draft, had decided to provide all forms of support to the opposition, opening the door to the funding and arming of violent groups for terrorist acts, he said. The League was providing support to countries that had long wanted to undermine Syria, and Member States should instead help Syria’s Government and people to face the challenges of extremism and terrorism, which had been documented, but not well publicized. Adopting the draft resolution would only lead to a worsening of the crisis by encouraging extremism, he warned, appealing to all Member States to vote against the text lest they increase the chaos in Syria. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” It would also play into the hands of Israel and help its efforts to defeat the aspirations of Palestinians and other people under occupation in the region. The representative of Venezuela, affirming the fundamental importance of sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, denounced the attempt by imperial powers and their allies to trigger regime change in Syria, even at the cost of further bloodshed, reproducing the dire consequences of the Libyan situation. Those Powers sought to occupy Syria, to foment a coup against its legitimate authorities and to turn the country into a protectorate. The draft resolution, with its mentoring and monitoring mechanisms, represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he said. The text also attacked the Government for human rights abuses while hiding the heinous crimes committed by terrorist groups against civilians, as well as attacks with varied weaponry against public officials and facilities. He went on to note that the draft ignored the Government’s initiatives to promote inclusive political dialogue and its call for a referendum on a new Constitution, which were the best options for moving forward. The draft denied the Syrian State’s right to protect its population and ensure internal peace and security, he said, adding that it did not call for opposition groups to dissociate themselves from groups engaged in violence. Commending the Russian Federation’s efforts for a more balanced text, he supported that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus as well its efforts, with China, to prevent the Security Council from being used to violate Syria’s sovereignty. “It is not desirable that the logic of war, which imperialists intend to impose on Syria and the world, prevails,” he said. Instead, the Assembly should be concerned about recognition of a Palestinian State, the end of Israeli rights violations and ending the blockade on Cuba. The representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea said that any issue relating to a Member State must be discussed in line with the principles of territorial integrity and State sovereignty. As a full-fledged member of the United Nations, Syria was no exception to that rule, he said, emphasizing that all violence in Syria must stop. The issues in that country should be settled in the best interest of its people. The country’s fate and future should be in their hands and they alone should lead the process towards a peaceful negotiated solution, which should be reached without outside influence. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would vote against the text, he said. The representative of Grenada offered condolences to the families of all those who had lost loved ones in Syria and stressed that the United Nations must act — and be seen to act — in line with the tenets of its founding Charter. Grenada was proceeding with the understanding that the draft resolution would “do only what the text says” — provide diplomatic support to Syria, the Arab League and the Secretary-General in order to help the Government and people of Syria to end all bloodshed, while finding an agreed solution. It also understood that the Assembly was not voting on or for a text that could in any way be interpreted as a basis for the removal of the Government, military intervention or any act against the spirit and letter of the Charter, she said. With that understanding, Grenada would vote in favour of the draft resolution, she added. The Assembly then adopted the resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions. The representatives of Burundi, Kyrgyzstan and Comoros informed the Secretariat that they had been unable to cast their votes properly. The representative of the Russian Federation said he had opposed the resolution because it clearly did not meet the criteria for ending the violence in Syria. The Russian delegation had proposed to place reasonable demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups and to demand that those groups themselves stop their attacks, he said, noting that those amendments had not been accepted. The Russian Federation would continue to work with all those striving for regional stability, he stressed. The representative of China said his Government had closely followed developments in Syria and was deeply worried about the escalating crisis that had caused civilian casualties and affected peace and security in the wider Middle East. China condemned all acts of violence against innocent civilians and urged the Syrian Government as well as all political factions to “immediately and fully” end all acts of violence and quickly restore order. It also called on the political factions in Syria to express their political aspirations through non-violent means under the rule of law. He went on to urge all parties concerned immediately to launch an inclusive political dialogue, without preconditions, hold a referendum on the new draft Constitution, as well as early parliamentary elections, and establish a national unity Government that included all factions. “We understand the concern of Arab countries and the League of Arab States on seeking a quick resolution to this issue,” he said, expressing support for their position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Emphasizing that the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he said: “We do not approve of armed intervention or forcing a so-called regime change in Syria.” Neither did China believe that sanctions or the threat of such measures would be helpful in achieving an appropriate solution, he continued. The actions of the United Nations and the wider international community should be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. Instead of complicating matters, such actions should promote the maintenance of peace and stability in the Middle East, he said, adding that he had voted in accordance with those principles. As a friend of the Arab people, China had always followed the purposes and principles of the Charter and would continue to work with the international community to resolve the situation in Syria. The representative of Serbia said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that all international efforts should aim solely for an end to the suffering of the Syrian people. At the same time, Serbia would have wished that the proposals and amendments put forward by some delegations had been considered and evaluated. In particular, the resolution would have been enriched by some of the changes submitted by the Russian Federation, which were “truly constructive”, he said, adding that they could have led to the consensus adoption of the text. He expressed hope that the international community would nevertheless take notice of those proposed amendments as the diplomatic process progressed. “Their content cannot be avoided, and sooner or later will need to be addressed,” he said. The representative of Pakistan said he supported the Arab League position and had voted in favour of the resolution, but condemned the use of violence on all sides. An immediate end to violence and killing, as well as a peaceful resolution were aims upon which all Member States agreed. In that light, Pakistan had been stressing the need for consensus on the Syrian situation, he said, noting that there could have been better efforts in the Assembly and the Security Council to reach consensus and to fully assure delegations that there was no intention to carry out a hostile intervention. Reiterating his call for the Syrian people to be respected, he said they must be allowed to resolve their crisis, and he reaffirmed the absolute importance of respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of all States. The representative of Costa Rica expressed his delegation’s deepest concern about the gruesome human rights violations being carried out in Syria. The international community could not remain silent, he stressed, calling on the Syrian authorities to definitively end attacks against civilians and other human rights violations. Condemning reports of sexual violence, including that perpetrated against girls and boys, he said all international stakeholders should work towards a swift and peaceful solution to the crisis, in line with the Arab League’s Plan of Action. The Human Rights Council had been playing its role of promoting a peaceful solution and, with the appropriate tools already at its disposal, it should move to create the position of Special Rapporteur on the situation in Syria, he said, calling attention to that Council’s report on the very serious acts — pointing to possible crimes against humanity — being carried out in Syria. Expressing concern that the Security Council had been unable to act on the matter, he said it had been prevented from acting by the use of a veto. The Council required deep reform, chiefly so that such measures could not be used to stymie action in the face of the worst international crimes, he emphasized. Stakeholders might disagree on certain matters, but the international community must speak resoundingly when human rights violations and acts of violence against civilians were committed. The international community should explore all avenues to reach a solution and ensure that those who had committed grave crimes were held responsible, including through referring the Syrian issue to the International Criminal Court. Finally, he said the “voices of change cannot be silenced with violence”, and called for a solution that met the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people. The representative of Ukraine said that the Arab League’s peaceful efforts for a negotiated settlement deserved the Assembly’s support. Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs had issued a statement last week in which it had expressed grave concern at the escalating violence in Syria, “which threatens to grow into a full-scale civil war, with unpredictable consequences in the entire Middle East”. Ukraine urged all parties in Syria to cease the violence and begin a dialogue, with the aim of finding a mutually acceptable and effective way to resolve their differences. The representative of Iran said he had voted against the resolution, in line with his delegation’s position that the Syrian people’s legitimate demands must be addressed through a peaceful and domestically led political process and without foreign intervention in the country’s internal affairs, which would only worsen the crisis and have ramifications on the region as a whole. He regretted, in addition, that the Assembly’s consideration of the Syrian crisis had not followed proper procedure, including the vote under the agenda item “prevention of armed conflict”, which did not apply. It was even more regrettable, he continued, that the resolution’s co-sponsors had chosen not to accommodate any amendments that might have made it more balanced, comprehensive and suited to the real situation on the ground. In that light, it was necessary to be clear and steadfast in condemning any act of violence and terrorism, in any form and manifestation, he emphasized. As long as armed groups continued to resort to violence, the crisis would continue, serving the interests of the Zionist regime. All States must work together in a practical manner to assist a peaceful resolution of the crisis. The representative of Bolivia, stating that he had voted against the resolution, asked the Assembly to consider exactly what was happening in Syria. With the many possibilities and few answers, it was clear that no one really knew exactly what the real situation was. All that was known was that there was a recognized opposition and a Government that was prepared to undertake meaningful reforms. Indeed, Syria’s representative had twice informed the Assembly that such reforms, including constitutional changes, had been agreed and were under way. Saying he understood that such reforms were a work in progress, he added that Bolivia knew the dangers of a political vacuum, which could lead to destabilization of the entire region. He said there were two possible ways in which the Syrian situation could end, the first being “the way of Libya”, in which the United Nations had facilitated a “recipe for intervention” to justify regime change through a Security Council resolution. That text had actually promoted further destabilization and civil unrest, he pointed out, warning: “I fear we have not learned our lessons from that situation.” He added: “Last year, it was the Security Council and this year it appears to be the General Assembly.” Bolivia seriously hoped that that was not the case, but had voted against the resolution just the same. The other possible ending was through a peaceful resolution, as had occurred in Egypt and Tunisia, he said. In those cases, efforts had been channelled towards democracy and changes of Government borne by the will of the people, not foreign intervention. Hopefully, the winds of the “Arab Spring” would blow in Syria’s direction and stir peaceful change, he said, adding that, had the amendments put forward by the Russian Federation been integrated into the resolution, it would have been adopted by consensus. The representative of Argentina said he had voted in favour of the resolution and emphasized the utmost importance of ensuring the protection and promotion of human rights in Syria. It was necessary to preserve the fundamental rights of free association and expression, he said, adding that the crisis in Syria should be resolved through dialogue and democratic negotiations involving all sectors of society. The representative of India noted that his country had condemned all violence in Syria, no matter by whom it was committed, and had been supporting a peaceful, inclusive and nationally led political resolution of the crisis. India had voted in favour of the resolution, in accordance with its support for the Arab League’s efforts for such a political resolution. Regrettably, however, there had been exceptions to established General Assembly procedures during the week, he said, expressing a wish that there had been greater readiness from all quarters to negotiate a text with a view to reaching consensus. He went on to note that the resolution expressly reaffirmed that all countries should refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State. It condemned all violence, irrespective of its origin, and called for serious political dialogue under the Arab League. The country’s leadership was a matter for the Syrian people to decide, he stressed, calling on all opposition forces to engage peacefully in constructive dialogue with the authorities. In that connection, he noted the Syrian leadership’s decision to hold a referendum and multi-party elections, expressing hope that that decision would create an environment of peace and facilitate a political process. The representative of Singapore said he had voted in favour of the resolution because it was not a politically motivated text, but instead dealt with a unique emergency in an appropriate manner. He joined with all in calling on all stakeholders to end violence and resolve the situation peacefully. The representative of Viet Nam, affirming his country’s concern about developments in Syria, joined the call for all parties in Syria to exercise self-restraint, end the violence and find a political solution through a domestically led constructive dialogue and national reconciliation, in conformity with the people’s aspirations. He also underlined the importance of respecting the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of States. Viet Nam supported efforts by the international community, including the Arab League, to contribute constructively to the restoration of stability and the promotion of national reconciliation in Syria, he said. The representative of Chile said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that the Assembly had raised its voice to “energetically” condemn the “grave and massive” violations of human rights under way in Syria. Serious acts, such as torture, sexual violence and arbitrary detention, including those highlighted by the High Commissioner for Human Rights in her briefing earlier in the week, must be denounced and those responsible brought to justice, he emphasized. All parties in Syria must open a true dialogue, and the authorities must allow access to those in need, he added. The representative of Bangladesh said he had voted in favour of the resolution. Despite its principled position of abstaining when texts targeted human rights situations in specific countries, Bangladesh had voted in favour of today’s resolution to end the shedding of the Syrian people’s blood, he said. The Assembly’s decision earlier in the week to consider the report of the Human Rights Council had contravened its rules of procedure, he said, expressing hope that no precedent would result from that action. The resolution had been drafted in line with the aims of the Arab League Action Plan, but Bangladesh would have hoped for the inclusion of the amendments submitted by the Russian Federation, he said, emphasizing that any actions taken in Syria must be in line with the aspirations of its people and lead towards a peaceful resolution. The representative of Egypt then made a general statement, saying that the international community had made its views known through its overwhelming support for the resolution. It had reaffirmed the need for a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis and sent a clear message to the Government to listen to the voice of the Syrian people and implement the decisions of the Arab League. The situation was deteriorating and all should now focus on ending the violence and meeting the people’s aspirations in order to avoid a worse situation, which would have effects in the region and lead to a humanitarian crisis. Egypt would continue to work with the League in that effort, he pledged. The representative of Syria also made a general statement, saying that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today as the resolution’s Western co-sponsors had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the Arab League had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Syria had left the Arab League temporarily; it was broken, politically and morally, he said, congratulating it on its new alliance with Israel. Syria no longer wanted the League to stand by it following its shameful actions, but it did want them to save whatever face it had left and cease the plotting against other Arab States. He went on to warn that the wealth of all the Gulf Cooperation Council countries would be squandered on losing causes and the price would be borne by all Arabs, who would be used as fuel to obtain the objectives of Israel and the West. Had the co-sponsors retained any credibility, they would have accepted the Russian amendments and worked to counter support for armed groups in Syria. In addition, the United Nations was betraying its own principles, and if that continued, the Organization would collapse, destroying the normative efforts of the past 66 years, he said. That would be the end result of intervention in the internal affairs of others. * *** * For information media • not an official record http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/ga11207.doc.htm ----------------------------------------------------------- Source: Name: United Nations Webcast Website: www.unmultimedia.org Country: United States of America ----------------------------------------------------------
123 mois0 -
30 min 00
Syria: 1 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012
Syria: 1 of 5 - 97th plenary meeting (Syria) - General Assembly - February 16, 2012 Prevention of armed conflict: draft resolution (A/66/L.36) [34] The General Assembly strongly condemned the continued “widespread and systematic” human rights violations by the Syrian authorities and demanded that the Government immediately cease all violence and protect its people. The 193-member body adopted a resolution backing Arab League efforts to resolve the crisis in Syria, where UN officials estimate that security forces have killed well over 5,400 people since the popular uprising began last March. http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/02/97th-plenary-meeting-general-assembly.html 16 February 2012 General Assembly GA/11207 Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • New York Sixty-sixth General Assembly Plenary 97th Meeting (PM) General Assembly Adopts Resolution Strongly Condemning ‘Widespread and Systematic’ Human Rights Violations by Syrian Authorities Text Passes by 137 Votes in Favour to 12 against, with 17 Abstentions Strongly condemning continued widespread and systematic human rights violations by the Syrian authorities, the General Assembly today voted overwhelmingly to call on both the Government and allied forces and armed groups “to stop all violence or reprisals immediately”. Adopting an Arab-backed resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions, the Assembly expressed grave concern at the deteriorating situation in Syria, and condemned a raft of violations carried out by the authorities, such as the use of force against civilians, the killing and persecution of protestors and journalists, and sexual violence and ill-treatment, including against children. The Assembly called on Syria to abide by its obligations under international law, and demanded that the Government, in line with the 2 November 2011 Action Plan of the League of Arab States, and its decisions of 22 January and 12 February 2012, without delay, stop all violence and protect its people, release all those detained during the unrest, withdraw all armed forces from cities and towns, guarantee peaceful demonstrations and allow unhindered access for Arab League monitors and international media. The language of the resolution closely mirrored that of a text vetoed by China and the Russian Federation in the Security Council two weeks earlier. (See Press Release SC/10536) The Assembly’s action also followed a special briefing on Monday by Navi Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who expressed outrage at the bloody 11-month crackdown on opposition protesters. She warned that the Council’s failure to take action had emboldened the Syrian Government to launch an all-out assault to crush dissent, most evident in its “appalling” siege of the city of Homs. (See Press Release GA/11206) By other terms of the text adopted today, the Assembly expressed its full support for the Arab League’s decision to facilitate a Syrian-led political transition to a democratic, pluralistic political system, including through a “serious political dialogue between the [Syrian Government] and the whole spectrum of the Syrian opposition”. Reaffirming its strong commitment to Syria’s sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, it further reaffirmed that all Member States “should refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State”. The measure requested Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and all relevant United Nations bodies to support the Arab League’s ongoing efforts to resolve the crisis peacefully, including through good offices and the appointment of a Special Envoy. The Secretary-General was also requested to report to the Assembly within 15 days on the status of the resolution. Ahead of the action, the Secretariat announced that approval of those elements of the text would incur $900,000 in additional budgetary resources for an initial six months of the 2012-2013 biennium. Egypt’s representative, presenting the draft resolution on behalf of the Arab Group, described the situation in Syria as “critical” and demanded that the Government immediately end the bloodshed. He said the text was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict. Stressing that the Arab League’s efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he expressed hope that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with “one voice” on events in Syria. Syria’s representative took the floor immediately thereafter in response to the points raised by his Egyptian counterpart, and said that the Government was responding in an accelerated manner to demands for reform. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments, in line with popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and to end the violence. However, Member States must stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria, he emphasized, declaring that no State would tolerate the presence of armed terrorists on its territory. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting such armed groups, even as they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. “Stop adding fuel to the fire,” he said, pointing out that the resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate itself from armed groups “says everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did its failure to condemn terrorist acts. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” Speaking after the vote, in a statement directed largely at the Arab League, he said that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today, as the Western co-sponsors of the resolution had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the League — “broken politically and morally” — had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Most other delegations hailed the resolution’s strong calls for an end to the violence and for the Syrian Government to protect civilians. Many reiterated their firm belief that the Arab League’s Action Plan, which proposed a negotiated solution among all Syrian factions, was the best path out of the crisis. Other speakers expressed grave concern about reports of massive human rights violations in Syria, and said that ending them must be the international community’s main priority. Costa Rica’s representative, who voted in favour of the resolution, emphasized that impunity must not be tolerated and, if necessary, the situation should be referred to the International Criminal Court. At the same time, several speakers echoed the concerns raised by the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, who voted against the text and roundly denounced “attempts by imperial Powers and their allies” to trigger regime change in Syria, “even at the cost of further bloodshed”. The text represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he added. He was also among those who commended the Russian Federation’s efforts to produce a more balanced text, by placing demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups, expressing support for that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus. China’s representative expressed support for the Arab League’s position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Yet, the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he stressed, adding that actions taken by the United Nations should not complicate matters, but be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. In other action, the Assembly decided that the Marshall Islands, Sudan and the Federated States of Micronesia had all made the payments necessary to reduce their arrears under Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Under that Article, a Member State in arrears cannot vote in the General Assembly “if the amount of the arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the contributions due from it for the preceding two years”. Also speaking in explanation of position were representatives of Venezuela, Grenada, Russian Federation, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Iran, Bolivia, Argentina, India, Singapore, Viet Nam, Chile, Bangladesh and Egypt. The General Assembly will reconvene at a time and date to be announced. Background Meeting this afternoon to consider matters relating to the prevention of armed conflict, the General Assembly was expected to take action on a draft resolution on the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36). Procedural Matters The representative of Syria, recalling the Assembly’s previous meeting on the report of the Human Rights Council, said his delegation had informed Member States at the time that the earlier meeting contravened the rules of procedure, and had called on the Assembly President to obtain a legal opinion on the matter. It had been announced during that meeting that a draft resolution on Syria would be presented to the Assembly, but today it was meeting under the item “Prevention of armed conflict”. It was “pathetic” that the Syrian issue was being addressed under at least three different agenda items, he said, adding that there was clearly confusion over the matter. The Assembly’s legitimacy was at stake, he said, asking the President to provide the rules of procedure governing the current meeting. GARY FRANCIS QUINLAN (Australia), Assembly Vice-President, responded by saying it was his understanding that the Assembly President could convene a meeting at any time, under any agenda item, to consider a draft resolution presented to Member States. The representative of Yemen said his delegation had been surprised by reference to Article 19 of the United Nations Charter. Action on Draft Resolution OSAMA ABDELKHALEK MAHMOUD (Egypt), introducing the draft resolution the situation in the Syrian Arab Republic (document A/66/L.36) on behalf of the Arab Group, said the Assembly was meeting as that country faced “critical circumstances”. The major escalation of violence there had been condemned by the League of Arab States, the Arab Group, the United Nations and the wider international community. Demanding that the Syrian Government end the bloodshed, he said the matter was at the very top of the Arab League’s agenda. That regional body had called for an immediate and faithful implementation of the Arab Action Plan as the only way to meet the aspirations of the Syrian people, he said, stressing the primacy of the Arab solution, under the “Arab roof”, and its rejection of military intervention. The draft before the Assembly was based on the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes, which was at the core of efforts to resolve the Syrian conflict, he continued. It reaffirmed Syria’s territorial integrity and supported the aims set out in the decisions and resolutions of the Arab League. Stressing that those efforts enjoyed unprecedented worldwide acceptance, he said more than 70 Member States were co-sponsoring the draft, and it was to be hoped that today’s vote would show that the international community was speaking with one voice on events taking place in Syria. Hopefully, the vote would also show broad and commanding support for the Arab Action Plan, he added, calling on all Member States to stand shoulder to shoulder with each other and the Syrian people by voting in favour of the text. Following that statement, the Secretariat announced that approval of the text, which requested the Secretary-General and all relevant bodies to support the Arab League’s efforts, including through good offices and by appointing a Special Envoy, would incur additional budgetary resources in the amount of $900,000 for an initial six months in the 2012-2013 biennium. Those requirements would be met through the use of commitment authority granted to the Secretary-General as related to the maintenance of international peace and security. Speaking in explanation of position, the representative of Syria said his country continued to respond in an accelerated manner to demands for reform, in response to all the points raised by Egypt’s representative in presenting the draft resolution. A new Constitution providing for the establishment of a modern democratic State would be put to a referendum on 26 February, as part of “extremely important” developments that responded to popular demands by the majority and the opposition. A comprehensive dialogue had been called for among all those who wished to maintain Syria’s stability and prestige and to end the violence. He called on all Member States to encourage the opposition to take part in that dialogue and not to impede participation by others. In addition, he called on Member States to stop encouraging the violent groups in Syria. No country could tolerate the presence of armed terrorist groups on its territory, he emphasized. Neither would it tolerate attacks against its officials, people and institutions. Unfortunately, certain countries were supporting the armed groups, even though they claimed to be anxious to save Syrian lives. They had also cut relations with Syria without justification, which showed that they did not wish to promote peaceful reform. He called on them to stop adding fuel to the fire, pointing out that the draft resolution’s failure to call on the opposition to dissociate themselves from armed groups “said everything” about the intention of the text’s co-sponsors, as did their failure to condemn terrorist acts. They had paid no heed to Syria’s plans for reforms, he added. The Arab League, in its resolution supported by today’s draft, had decided to provide all forms of support to the opposition, opening the door to the funding and arming of violent groups for terrorist acts, he said. The League was providing support to countries that had long wanted to undermine Syria, and Member States should instead help Syria’s Government and people to face the challenges of extremism and terrorism, which had been documented, but not well publicized. Adopting the draft resolution would only lead to a worsening of the crisis by encouraging extremism, he warned, appealing to all Member States to vote against the text lest they increase the chaos in Syria. Asking whether anyone had thought about the aftermath, he warned: “This step will not only bring disaster to Syria, but to all international relations.” It would also play into the hands of Israel and help its efforts to defeat the aspirations of Palestinians and other people under occupation in the region. The representative of Venezuela, affirming the fundamental importance of sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, denounced the attempt by imperial powers and their allies to trigger regime change in Syria, even at the cost of further bloodshed, reproducing the dire consequences of the Libyan situation. Those Powers sought to occupy Syria, to foment a coup against its legitimate authorities and to turn the country into a protectorate. The draft resolution, with its mentoring and monitoring mechanisms, represented an intervention in the internal affairs of an independent State, he said. The text also attacked the Government for human rights abuses while hiding the heinous crimes committed by terrorist groups against civilians, as well as attacks with varied weaponry against public officials and facilities. He went on to note that the draft ignored the Government’s initiatives to promote inclusive political dialogue and its call for a referendum on a new Constitution, which were the best options for moving forward. The draft denied the Syrian State’s right to protect its population and ensure internal peace and security, he said, adding that it did not call for opposition groups to dissociate themselves from groups engaged in violence. Commending the Russian Federation’s efforts for a more balanced text, he supported that country’s peace initiatives in Damascus as well its efforts, with China, to prevent the Security Council from being used to violate Syria’s sovereignty. “It is not desirable that the logic of war, which imperialists intend to impose on Syria and the world, prevails,” he said. Instead, the Assembly should be concerned about recognition of a Palestinian State, the end of Israeli rights violations and ending the blockade on Cuba. The representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea said that any issue relating to a Member State must be discussed in line with the principles of territorial integrity and State sovereignty. As a full-fledged member of the United Nations, Syria was no exception to that rule, he said, emphasizing that all violence in Syria must stop. The issues in that country should be settled in the best interest of its people. The country’s fate and future should be in their hands and they alone should lead the process towards a peaceful negotiated solution, which should be reached without outside influence. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would vote against the text, he said. The representative of Grenada offered condolences to the families of all those who had lost loved ones in Syria and stressed that the United Nations must act — and be seen to act — in line with the tenets of its founding Charter. Grenada was proceeding with the understanding that the draft resolution would “do only what the text says” — provide diplomatic support to Syria, the Arab League and the Secretary-General in order to help the Government and people of Syria to end all bloodshed, while finding an agreed solution. It also understood that the Assembly was not voting on or for a text that could in any way be interpreted as a basis for the removal of the Government, military intervention or any act against the spirit and letter of the Charter, she said. With that understanding, Grenada would vote in favour of the draft resolution, she added. The Assembly then adopted the resolution by a recorded vote of 137 in favour to 12 against, with 17 abstentions. The representatives of Burundi, Kyrgyzstan and Comoros informed the Secretariat that they had been unable to cast their votes properly. The representative of the Russian Federation said he had opposed the resolution because it clearly did not meet the criteria for ending the violence in Syria. The Russian delegation had proposed to place reasonable demands on opposition forces to disassociate themselves from armed groups and to demand that those groups themselves stop their attacks, he said, noting that those amendments had not been accepted. The Russian Federation would continue to work with all those striving for regional stability, he stressed. The representative of China said his Government had closely followed developments in Syria and was deeply worried about the escalating crisis that had caused civilian casualties and affected peace and security in the wider Middle East. China condemned all acts of violence against innocent civilians and urged the Syrian Government as well as all political factions to “immediately and fully” end all acts of violence and quickly restore order. It also called on the political factions in Syria to express their political aspirations through non-violent means under the rule of law. He went on to urge all parties concerned immediately to launch an inclusive political dialogue, without preconditions, hold a referendum on the new draft Constitution, as well as early parliamentary elections, and establish a national unity Government that included all factions. “We understand the concern of Arab countries and the League of Arab States on seeking a quick resolution to this issue,” he said, expressing support for their position that the violence must stop immediately and that civilians must be protected. Emphasizing that the international community should respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity fully, he said: “We do not approve of armed intervention or forcing a so-called regime change in Syria.” Neither did China believe that sanctions or the threat of such measures would be helpful in achieving an appropriate solution, he continued. The actions of the United Nations and the wider international community should be helpful in easing tensions, facilitating political dialogue and resolving differences. Instead of complicating matters, such actions should promote the maintenance of peace and stability in the Middle East, he said, adding that he had voted in accordance with those principles. As a friend of the Arab people, China had always followed the purposes and principles of the Charter and would continue to work with the international community to resolve the situation in Syria. The representative of Serbia said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that all international efforts should aim solely for an end to the suffering of the Syrian people. At the same time, Serbia would have wished that the proposals and amendments put forward by some delegations had been considered and evaluated. In particular, the resolution would have been enriched by some of the changes submitted by the Russian Federation, which were “truly constructive”, he said, adding that they could have led to the consensus adoption of the text. He expressed hope that the international community would nevertheless take notice of those proposed amendments as the diplomatic process progressed. “Their content cannot be avoided, and sooner or later will need to be addressed,” he said. The representative of Pakistan said he supported the Arab League position and had voted in favour of the resolution, but condemned the use of violence on all sides. An immediate end to violence and killing, as well as a peaceful resolution were aims upon which all Member States agreed. In that light, Pakistan had been stressing the need for consensus on the Syrian situation, he said, noting that there could have been better efforts in the Assembly and the Security Council to reach consensus and to fully assure delegations that there was no intention to carry out a hostile intervention. Reiterating his call for the Syrian people to be respected, he said they must be allowed to resolve their crisis, and he reaffirmed the absolute importance of respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of all States. The representative of Costa Rica expressed his delegation’s deepest concern about the gruesome human rights violations being carried out in Syria. The international community could not remain silent, he stressed, calling on the Syrian authorities to definitively end attacks against civilians and other human rights violations. Condemning reports of sexual violence, including that perpetrated against girls and boys, he said all international stakeholders should work towards a swift and peaceful solution to the crisis, in line with the Arab League’s Plan of Action. The Human Rights Council had been playing its role of promoting a peaceful solution and, with the appropriate tools already at its disposal, it should move to create the position of Special Rapporteur on the situation in Syria, he said, calling attention to that Council’s report on the very serious acts — pointing to possible crimes against humanity — being carried out in Syria. Expressing concern that the Security Council had been unable to act on the matter, he said it had been prevented from acting by the use of a veto. The Council required deep reform, chiefly so that such measures could not be used to stymie action in the face of the worst international crimes, he emphasized. Stakeholders might disagree on certain matters, but the international community must speak resoundingly when human rights violations and acts of violence against civilians were committed. The international community should explore all avenues to reach a solution and ensure that those who had committed grave crimes were held responsible, including through referring the Syrian issue to the International Criminal Court. Finally, he said the “voices of change cannot be silenced with violence”, and called for a solution that met the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people. The representative of Ukraine said that the Arab League’s peaceful efforts for a negotiated settlement deserved the Assembly’s support. Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs had issued a statement last week in which it had expressed grave concern at the escalating violence in Syria, “which threatens to grow into a full-scale civil war, with unpredictable consequences in the entire Middle East”. Ukraine urged all parties in Syria to cease the violence and begin a dialogue, with the aim of finding a mutually acceptable and effective way to resolve their differences. The representative of Iran said he had voted against the resolution, in line with his delegation’s position that the Syrian people’s legitimate demands must be addressed through a peaceful and domestically led political process and without foreign intervention in the country’s internal affairs, which would only worsen the crisis and have ramifications on the region as a whole. He regretted, in addition, that the Assembly’s consideration of the Syrian crisis had not followed proper procedure, including the vote under the agenda item “prevention of armed conflict”, which did not apply. It was even more regrettable, he continued, that the resolution’s co-sponsors had chosen not to accommodate any amendments that might have made it more balanced, comprehensive and suited to the real situation on the ground. In that light, it was necessary to be clear and steadfast in condemning any act of violence and terrorism, in any form and manifestation, he emphasized. As long as armed groups continued to resort to violence, the crisis would continue, serving the interests of the Zionist regime. All States must work together in a practical manner to assist a peaceful resolution of the crisis. The representative of Bolivia, stating that he had voted against the resolution, asked the Assembly to consider exactly what was happening in Syria. With the many possibilities and few answers, it was clear that no one really knew exactly what the real situation was. All that was known was that there was a recognized opposition and a Government that was prepared to undertake meaningful reforms. Indeed, Syria’s representative had twice informed the Assembly that such reforms, including constitutional changes, had been agreed and were under way. Saying he understood that such reforms were a work in progress, he added that Bolivia knew the dangers of a political vacuum, which could lead to destabilization of the entire region. He said there were two possible ways in which the Syrian situation could end, the first being “the way of Libya”, in which the United Nations had facilitated a “recipe for intervention” to justify regime change through a Security Council resolution. That text had actually promoted further destabilization and civil unrest, he pointed out, warning: “I fear we have not learned our lessons from that situation.” He added: “Last year, it was the Security Council and this year it appears to be the General Assembly.” Bolivia seriously hoped that that was not the case, but had voted against the resolution just the same. The other possible ending was through a peaceful resolution, as had occurred in Egypt and Tunisia, he said. In those cases, efforts had been channelled towards democracy and changes of Government borne by the will of the people, not foreign intervention. Hopefully, the winds of the “Arab Spring” would blow in Syria’s direction and stir peaceful change, he said, adding that, had the amendments put forward by the Russian Federation been integrated into the resolution, it would have been adopted by consensus. The representative of Argentina said he had voted in favour of the resolution and emphasized the utmost importance of ensuring the protection and promotion of human rights in Syria. It was necessary to preserve the fundamental rights of free association and expression, he said, adding that the crisis in Syria should be resolved through dialogue and democratic negotiations involving all sectors of society. The representative of India noted that his country had condemned all violence in Syria, no matter by whom it was committed, and had been supporting a peaceful, inclusive and nationally led political resolution of the crisis. India had voted in favour of the resolution, in accordance with its support for the Arab League’s efforts for such a political resolution. Regrettably, however, there had been exceptions to established General Assembly procedures during the week, he said, expressing a wish that there had been greater readiness from all quarters to negotiate a text with a view to reaching consensus. He went on to note that the resolution expressly reaffirmed that all countries should refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State. It condemned all violence, irrespective of its origin, and called for serious political dialogue under the Arab League. The country’s leadership was a matter for the Syrian people to decide, he stressed, calling on all opposition forces to engage peacefully in constructive dialogue with the authorities. In that connection, he noted the Syrian leadership’s decision to hold a referendum and multi-party elections, expressing hope that that decision would create an environment of peace and facilitate a political process. The representative of Singapore said he had voted in favour of the resolution because it was not a politically motivated text, but instead dealt with a unique emergency in an appropriate manner. He joined with all in calling on all stakeholders to end violence and resolve the situation peacefully. The representative of Viet Nam, affirming his country’s concern about developments in Syria, joined the call for all parties in Syria to exercise self-restraint, end the violence and find a political solution through a domestically led constructive dialogue and national reconciliation, in conformity with the people’s aspirations. He also underlined the importance of respecting the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of States. Viet Nam supported efforts by the international community, including the Arab League, to contribute constructively to the restoration of stability and the promotion of national reconciliation in Syria, he said. The representative of Chile said he had voted in favour of the text, adding that the Assembly had raised its voice to “energetically” condemn the “grave and massive” violations of human rights under way in Syria. Serious acts, such as torture, sexual violence and arbitrary detention, including those highlighted by the High Commissioner for Human Rights in her briefing earlier in the week, must be denounced and those responsible brought to justice, he emphasized. All parties in Syria must open a true dialogue, and the authorities must allow access to those in need, he added. The representative of Bangladesh said he had voted in favour of the resolution. Despite its principled position of abstaining when texts targeted human rights situations in specific countries, Bangladesh had voted in favour of today’s resolution to end the shedding of the Syrian people’s blood, he said. The Assembly’s decision earlier in the week to consider the report of the Human Rights Council had contravened its rules of procedure, he said, expressing hope that no precedent would result from that action. The resolution had been drafted in line with the aims of the Arab League Action Plan, but Bangladesh would have hoped for the inclusion of the amendments submitted by the Russian Federation, he said, emphasizing that any actions taken in Syria must be in line with the aspirations of its people and lead towards a peaceful resolution. The representative of Egypt then made a general statement, saying that the international community had made its views known through its overwhelming support for the resolution. It had reaffirmed the need for a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis and sent a clear message to the Government to listen to the voice of the Syrian people and implement the decisions of the Arab League. The situation was deteriorating and all should now focus on ending the violence and meeting the people’s aspirations in order to avoid a worse situation, which would have effects in the region and lead to a humanitarian crisis. Egypt would continue to work with the League in that effort, he pledged. The representative of Syria also made a general statement, saying that a “Trojan horse” had been unmasked today as the resolution’s Western co-sponsors had paved the way to internationalizing the situation. It was clear that the Arab League had been kidnapped by the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, he added. Syria had left the Arab League temporarily; it was broken, politically and morally, he said, congratulating it on its new alliance with Israel. Syria no longer wanted the League to stand by it following its shameful actions, but it did want them to save whatever face it had left and cease the plotting against other Arab States. He went on to warn that the wealth of all the Gulf Cooperation Council countries would be squandered on losing causes and the price would be borne by all Arabs, who would be used as fuel to obtain the objectives of Israel and the West. Had the co-sponsors retained any credibility, they would have accepted the Russian amendments and worked to counter support for armed groups in Syria. In addition, the United Nations was betraying its own principles, and if that continued, the Organization would collapse, destroying the normative efforts of the past 66 years, he said. That would be the end result of intervention in the internal affairs of others. * *** * For information media • not an official record http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/ga11207.doc.htm ----------------------------------------------------------- Source: Name: United Nations Webcast Website: www.unmultimedia.org Country: United States of America ----------------------------------------------------------
173 mois0 -
4 min 02
[MV] BIG BANG - BLUE
Big Bang est un groupe coréen de hip-hop/RnB faisant partie de le YG Family, produit de la YG Entertainement (qui est également le label d'artistes tels que Se7en, Jinusean, 1TYM, Gummy, 2NE1).Les talents de BIG BANG sont multiples:chant, rap, danse, écriture. Le groupe était initialement composé de six membres : G-Dragon, Tae Yang, T. O. P, Dae Sung, Seung Ri et SO-1. Le groupe devant compter cinq membres, ce dernier, étant jugé le moins performant des six garçons, dût quitter BIG BANG. Actuellement, le groupe compte donc cinq membres. MEMBRES G-Dragon Nom réel : Kwon JiYong (권지용) Surnom : G-Dragon, G-D Date de naissance : 18 Août 1988 Position : Leader / Rappeur / Chanteur / Compositeur T.O.P Nom réel : Choi SeungHyun (최승현) Surnom : T. O. P Date de naissance : 4 Novembre 1987 Position : Beat Boxer / Compositeur / Rappeur Tae Yang Nom réel : Dong YoungBae (동영배) Surnoms : Tae Yang, Sol, YB Taekwon Date de naissance : 18 Mai 1988 Position : Leader vocal / Chorégraphe / Compositeur Dae Sung Nom réel : Kang DaeSung (강대성) Surnoms : Dae Sung, D-Lite Date de naissance : 26 Avril 1989 Position : Chanteur Seung Ri Nom réel : Lee SeungHyun (이승현) Surnoms : Seung Ri, VI, Victory Date de naissance : 12 Décembre 1990 Position : Chorégraphe / Vocaliste / Chanteur Ancien membre : So-1 Nom réel : Jang HyunSeung (장현승) Date de naissance : 3 Septembre 1989 Il fait maintenant partie du groupe BEAST CHRONOLOGIE •2005 / 2006• Avant le succès de Big Bang, chaque membre connait un certain succès et une certaine popularité, indépendamment des autres, à degrès différents, au sein de la YG Entertainment. G-Dragon et Tae Yang font partie de YG Entertainment depuis l'âge de douze ans et sont alors connus sous les noms de G-D et YB Taekwon (le vrai nom de Tae Yang est YoungBae). T. O. P dévoile ses talents de rappeur pendant que SeungRi s'intègre à la YG grâce au show télévisé "Let's Cokeplay Battle Shinhwa". Lorsque les six candidats sont sélectionnés pour tenter de rejoindre BIG BANG commence le tournage d'un documentaire sensé retracer la naissance du groupe. Il montre les membres pendant leurs entrainements, avant qu'ils ne deviennent un groupe officiel. Le documentaire comprend 10 épisodes, plus un onzième, tourné après le choix final des membres du groupe. Chacun des six premiers épisodes se concentre sur un candidat en particulier et sa motivation à devenir chanteur, à rejoindre le groupe. Le documentaire décrit la difficulté des entraînements en montrant les séances de pratique de danse et de chant. Deux membres sont sélectionnés pour l'élimination. Il s'agit de SeungRi et So-1. Ils sont priés de montrer ce qu'ils savent faire devant le CEO de la YG, Yang HyunSuk. Ce dernier, trouvant So-1 trop timide, décide de l'éliminer. Par contre, il est impressionné par la performance de SeungRi au niveau du chant et de la danse et choisit d'en faire un membre du groupe. Avant le choix final du nom du groupe, les membres proposent d'autres noms comme "Apex", "Stump, " et "Diamond". Finalement, Yang HyunSuk décide que le groupe s'appellera BIG BANG. Le groupe fait ses débuts au concert de la YG Family, le 19 Août 2006, à l'Arène de Gymnastique dans le Parc Olympique de Séoul. Avant la sortie de leur premier album, trois premiers EP sortent en quelques mois. Le premier EP, "The First Single Album", contenant la chanson "This Love" (une reprise du groupe Maroon 5), entre dans le top 10. Le cd se vend à environ 40. 000 exemplaires. Le second EP est "BIG BANG is V. I. P". Il sort un mois après le premier et se vend à 32. 000 copies. Enfin le troisième, "B I G B A N G 0 3", suit le modèle des deux opus précédents et se vend à 30. 000 exemplaires. Plus tard dans l'année, BIG BANG crée son propre fan-club, se nommant eux-mêmes "V. I. P", en référence à l'un de leurs cds. À la différence d'autres fan-clubs, les fans de BIG BANG n'ont pas de couleur de ballon pour montrer leur soutien aux concerts; au lieu de cela les fans de BIG BANG arborent mouchoirs et bandanas noirs et blancs (représentant évidemment le big bang). Fin décembre 2006, BIG BANG donne son premier concert : "The Real". Le mois suivant, leur premier album fait son entrée dans les bacs. Il s'intitule "Since 2007" et est essentiellement composé des chansons de leurs précédents singles. Il se vend à plus de 48. 000 copies. •2007 / 2008• Le 8 Février 2007 sort l'album live du concert de BIG BANG : "The First / Real Live Concert". Il s'écoule à 30. 000 exemplaires. Entre Mai et Juillet 2007, BIG BANG exécute sa première tournée en Corée. Les membres donnent des concerts dans cinq grandes villes coréennes : Incheon, Daegu, Changwon, Jeonju et Busan. En Août 2007, le groupe réalise son premier mini album intitulé "Always". BIG BANG prend peu à peu le contrôle de sa musique : le leader, G-Dragon, écrit et produit quelques chansons de l'opus. Le mini-album est bien accueilli par les critiques et par les fans, spécialement la chanson "Lies". "Lies" devient le premier tube de BIG BANG, elle se classe numéro un du "SBS Hit Songs", suivi de "MBC's Music Core", "KBS Music Bank" et "Mnet's Countdown". Elle conserve sa première place dans les charts pendant plusieurs semaines. Le mini-album connaît un tel succès que BIG BANG reçoit plusieurs récompenses fin 2007, dont "Le Meilleur Groupe Masculin" et "La Chanson de l'Année"duFestivaldeMusiqueM.NET/KM 2007. Plus tard, en 2008, BIG BANG remporte le prestigieux "Daesang" aux 17ème Prix de Musique de Séoul. Le second mini-album du groupe "Hot Issue" sort quelques mois après et connaît un succès similaire à celui du précédent. Cela grâce à une chanson "Last Farewell" qui, à la manière de "Lies" précédemment, permet au groupe de remporter un prix : "Prix de Musique Numérique : Chanson du Mois", par Cyworld, face à de forts adversaires comme les Wonder Girls ou encore les F. T Island. "Last Farewell" restera numéro un des charts durant plusieurs semaines. Les billets pour la seconde programmation de concerts de BIG BANG, entre le 28 et 30 décembre 2008, seront vendus en dix minutes. Après son succès en Corée du Sud, BIG BANG décide de s'exporter au Japon. Leur album japonais "For The World" est composé de leurs précédents singles et d'une autre chanson "How Gee". Les 28 et 29 Mars, BIG BANG se produit en concert au JCB hall, au Tokyo Dome. En Mai, un mini-album sort de nouveau au Japon : "With U". Le groupe rentre en Corée mi-2008 pour que chaque membre se consacre à ses projets solos. Finalement, un troisième mini-album sort : "Stand Up". Il est crée avec l'aide de Daishi Dance et d'un groupe de punk/rock pour la chanson "Oh My Friend". La première chanson présentée par cet album est "Day By Day".Comme dans les précédents albums, G-Dragon écrit et produit les chansons de l'album à l'exception de "A Good Man", dont l'auteur n'est autre que T. O. P. Le mini-album s'écoule à 100. 000 exemplaires. Les chansons occuperont toutes une bonne place dans les charts du Top 20 pendant six semaines : "Day by Day" sera numéro un, "Heaven" deuxième, "Oh My Friend" neuvième, "A Good Man" douzième et "Lady" seizième : un total de cinq chansons dans le top 20 pour le groupe. "Remember" sort en Corée fin 2008. Son titre phare "Sunset Glow" rencontrera un franc succès. Fin 2008, BIG BANG recueille son deuxième "Artiste de l'Année" à la cérémonie deprixdeFestivaldeMusiquedeKMM.NET 2008. •2009• Le groupe fait un break début 2009. Chacun se consacre à ses projets solos. Pendant cette période, BIG BANG collabore avec un nouveau groupe féminin de la YG Entertainment, 2NE1, dans le cadre d'une campagne publicitaire pour une célèbre marque de téléphonie mobile. Ensemble, ils chantent "Lollipop", qui gagnera très vite la première place de plusieurs classements. En Mai 2009, BIG BANG sort un nouveau single japonais, "My Heaven", une chanson de l'un de leurs précédents albums ("Heaven" du mini-album "Stand Up"), chantée en japonais cette fois-ci. En juillet 2009, sort le single japonais "Gara Gara Go". Il est composé de quatre titres : "Gara Gara Go", "Top Of The World", "Stylish" et "So Beautiful". Un album japonnais est prévu pour le 19 Aout 2009 : "BIGBANG". De plus, YG a signé un contrat avec 'Sudden Attack' afin de faire apparaître BIG BANG en personnages de jeu vidéo online. Chacun des membres aura son propre personnage, avec ses effets sonores et spéciaux propres à chacun. En Aout, Dae Sung est victime d'un terrible accident de la route qui le contraint à renoncer à ses activités professionnelles sur une durée de huit semaines. Il renonce donc au Musical "Shouting" dans lequel Seung Ri apparait seul. Le groupe apparaît pour un show signé BIG BANG, au SBS's Idol Big Show. Dae Sung n'est pas présent mais c'est bien en tant que BIG BANG que les quatre autres membres assurent le spectacle. Cette performance est la première depuis plus de dix mois. En juillet/août ils apparaissent aussi dans une émission en plusieurs épisodessurM.NET en compagnie des 2NE1. Cette émission, YGTV, permet de découvrir les coulisses des deux groupes, un peu à la manière du documentaire dans les débuts de BIG BANG en 2006. La deuxième moitié de 2009 est marquée par le retour des membres de BIG BANG dans des projets solos. G-Dragon sort son premier album solo "Heartbreaker" qui rencontre un franc succès. Tae Yang sort deux singles "Where U At" (feat Teddy) et "Wedding Dress". Quand à T. O P. , il se fait remarquer pour son rôle dans le drama "IRIS" qui obtient un taux d'audience très élevé. On voit aussi Seung Ri au cinéma. En novembre 2009, sort le troisième single japonais, "Koe wo Kikasete". BIG BANG se produit alors sur scène lors de nombreuses live performances. •2010• Début 2010, BIG BANG enchaine les concerts. D'abord le "Big Show 2010" en janvier, puis "Electric Love Tour" au Japon en février. Ce dernier concert aura la chance d'être ensuite diffusé sur TBS pour le plus grand plaisir des fans du groupe. En février 2010, Cyon lance une campagne de publicité en compagnie de BIG BANG. Il s'agit de trouver une Lollipop Girl qui aura l'opportunité de tourner un CF en compagnie du groupe. BIG BANG sort à cette occasion le digital single "Lollipop pt. 2". En avril 2010, YG Entertainment annonce le retour de BIG BANG en Corée avec deux nouveaux mini-albums prévus. En mai 2010, BIG BANG fait partie d'une nouvelle campagne publicitaire en compagnie de Kim Yuna et du groupe Trans Fixion pour soutenir l'équipe coréenne de Football lors de la coupe du monde en Afrique du Sud. Ils collaborent donc pour un nouveau digital single intitulé "Victory Cry". Début juin, sortira le single japonais "Tell Me Goodbye" dont la chanson principale fait partie de l'OST du drama "IRIS", diffusé au Japon et dont T. O. P est l'un des acteurs principaux. Ce dernier partagera l'affiche du film "Into The Gunfire" avec l'acteur Kang Sang Woo. Ce film sortira dans les salles coréennes en Juin 2010. En attendant le nouvel album coréen, BIG BANG sort son 5ème single japonais, nommé Beautiful Hangover le 25 août....
2123 mois0 -
15 min 22
T-ara + Special Stage 3 (BEAST, 2PM, SHINee & U-KISS) - Show KBS Music Bank in Paris 2012.02.08 Part9
9ème partie du KBS Musik Bank in Paris qui s'est déroulé à Paris Bercy le 08 février 2012 devant pas moins de 12 000 fans venus de toute l'Europe et du monde. Performence ► T-ara + Special Stage 3 : HyunSeung (BEAST), Junsu (2PM), Taemin (SHINee) & Kevin (U-KISS) reprennent "More Than Words" du groupe Extreme (1990). T-ara est le nouveau groupe de la Core Contents Media qui a produit d'autres groupes tels que les SeeYa, les DaVichi, les Supernova, etc. . Le groupe était initialement composé de 5 membres : Eun Jeong, Hyo Min, Ji Yeon, Ji Won et Ji Ae. Elles ont débuté en interprétant la chanson Good Person Ver 1 pour l'OST du drama Cinderella Man. Suite à des différences de style, Ji Won et Ji Ae ont quitté le groupe qui a alors accueilli Boram, Qri et So Yeon. MEMBRES ACTUELLES : EUNJEONG Nom : Ham Eun Jeong Date de naissance : 12 Décembre 1988 Position dans le groupe : Leader/Chanteuse principale/Rappeuse HYOMIN Nom : Park Seon Yeon Date de naissance : 30 Mai 1989 Position dans le groupe : Chanteuse principale/Rappeuse JIYEON Nom : Park Ji Yeon Date de naissance : 7 Juin 1993 Position dans le groupe : Chanteuse secondaire BORAM Nom : Jeon Bo Ram Date de naissance : 22 Mars 1986 Position dans le groupe : Chanteuse secondaire QRI Nom : Lee Ji Hyun Date de naissance : 12 Décembre 1986 Position dans le groupe : Chanteuse de soutien SOYEON Nom : Park So Yeon Date de naissance : 5 Octobre 1987 Position dans le groupe : Chanteuse principale Signe particulier : Elle a été une trainee (stagiaire) chez la SM Entertainment, elle devait faire partie des SNSD qui au départ devait être un groupe de 11 filles. ANCIENNES MEMBRES : JIWON Nom : Yang Ji Won Date de naissance : 5 Avril 1988 Position dans le groupe : Chanteuse Signe particulier : Ji Won devait faire partie du même groupe que Yoo Bin (Wonder Girls), UEE (After School), Hyo Sung (Secret) et Gina Choi (future soliste de la CUBE Entertainment) mais la Good Entertainment a coulé avant que le groupe ne débute. Ji Won a décidé de quitter le groupe pour cause de différence de style. JIAE Nom : Lee Ji Ae Date de naissance : 6 Août 1987 Position dans le groupe : Leader/Chanteuse principale Signe particulier : A la base c'était Ji Ae qui devait être la Leader des T-ara mais après son départ c'est Eun Jeong qui a été choisie. Ji Ae a décidé de quitter le groupe pour cause de différence de style. RÉSUMÉ Des cinq membres, Ji Yeon est celle dont on entend le plus parler, elle a participé au single Female Generation/Forever Love avec les SeeYa et les DaVichi et elle a été la première membre des T-ara à être annoncée. Elle a aussi posé comme mannequin avec le groupe SHINee pour ÉLÉGANT CF en 2008. Non seulement elle est apparue dans plusieurs MV comme Saranghae des SG Wannabe et My love is crying mais on lui donne également le surnom de seconde Kim Tae Hee pour sa ressemblance à l'actrice Kim Tae Hee. Pour le reste des 4 membres, elles sont toutes soient des danseuse, soient des actrices. Ji Won a récemment été récompensée pour sa prestation dans le film More Than Blue. Eun Jeong est récemment apparu dans le film Death Bell. Hyo Min est apparue dans le MV Heaven des FT Island. Les membres Ji Won et Ji Ae ont quitté le groupe au mois de Juin 2009 pour cause de différence de style. La Core Contents Media a décidé de les remplacer par Jeon Boram, la fille de Jeon Young Rok. Jeon Boram a déjà participé au single digital It is Today. Au mois de juillet 2009, Qri et So Yeon rejoignent le groupe faisant en définitive des T-ara un groupe de sixchanteuses.Commence alors la promotion de leur premier single Lies. Elles ont d'ailleurs reçu le prix Super Rookie pour le mois d'Août grâce à leur single Lies. Récemment elles ont collaboré avec le groupe Supernova pour sortir le single TTL(Time To Love).En vue de ce succès, les T-ara ont été choisies pour promouvoir le Samsung YP-P3.Leur duo avec les Supernova ayant été plusieurs fois premier au K-Chart, ils ont enregistré un autre single, avec cette fois-ci les membres des deux groupes au complet, TTL Listen.2.Titre qui a rencontré le même succès et qu'ils ont chanté au Dream Concert 2009. Les T-ara ont aussi enregistré une chanson Apple Song en vue de leur CF pour Nonghyup Apples. Elles ont aussi sorti un MV de Apple Song ou Ji Yeon a le rôle principal. Leur premier album Absolute First Album est sorti le 4 Décembre 2009 et contenait leurs principaux titres (Good Person, Wanna Play, Lies, TTL (Time To Love), TTL Listen. 2) et d'autres inédits. La Core Contents Media a sorti les MV de deux titres inédits de l'album des T-ara, Bo Peep Bo Peep et Like The First Time qui ont suscité l'intérêt des internautes qui ont d'ailleurs privilégié Like The FirstTime. Mais contre tout attente le groupe a commencé par la promotion de Bo Peep Bo Peep, chanson avec laquelle elles ont gagné 4 Mutizens Awards aux Music Bank et Inkigayo. Elles ont ensuite fait la promotion de Like The First Time mais elle s'est terminée rapidement à cause de l'emploi du temps surchargé de Ji Yeon alors occupée à tourner le drama God Of Study et à cause de l'état de santé de So Yeon ayant contracté le H1N1. Leur repackage album est sorti le 23 Février 2010 avec deux nouveaux titres I Go Crazy Because Of You et I'm Really Hurt. Des teasers de I Go Crazy Because Of You ont de nouveau suscité l'intérêt des internautes puisque les T-ara abordent un nouveau concept sexy. La promotion de I Go Crazy Because Of You a débuté le 25 Février 2010. RÉCOMPENSES [2009] Cyworld Digital Music Awards - Rookie du mois d'Août < Lies > [2009] Cyworld Digital Music Awards - Ting's Choice Artist Award < T. T. L > [2009] Golden Disk Award – Award du meilleur nouveau groupe
1943 mois0 -
2 min 50
Matt Lloyd Review Testimonial - Results Reviewed From Matt Lloyd's 10k Leads In 100 Days Program
http://hypertracker.com/go/gosolutions/120221yt10kt/ My testimonial for Matt Lloyd's 10,000 Leads in 100 Days Program. This Matt Lloyd testimonial is based on my early personal results of taking action on some of the marketing channels and strategies he reveals in his course. He told me that there would be times I'd want to quit but in the end it would all be worth it. I appreciate his honesty...but I don't think I'll be quitting anytime soon. http://youtu.be/z1PdQb8mxT8
13 mois0 -
4 min 18
miss A - Touch MV
miss A (미스에이), est un girlsband sud-coréen composé de 4 membres, formé en 2010 par la JYP Entertainment. miss A est reconnu a ce jour comme l'un dès rares groupes a avoir gagné aux émissions musicales M ! Countdown, Music Bank et Inkigayo pour leur chanson de début. En effet, leur première victoire a été seulement 22 jours après leur date de début officielle avec leur chanson "Bad Girl Good Girl" classée HIT de l'année 2010 par de nombreux charts sud-coréens. ★ MEMBRES ★ FEI Nom réel : Wang Fei Fei / 왕페이페이 / 王霏霏 Position : Main Vocalist Nationalité : Chinoise Née le : 27/04/1987 JIA Nom réel : Meng Jia / 맹가 / 孟佳 Position : Rapper / Vocalist / Lead Dancer Nationalité : Chinoise Née le : 03/02/1989 MIN Nom réel : Lee Min Young / 이민영 / 李玟暎 Position : Lead Vocalist / Main Dancer Nationalité : Coréenne Née le : 21/06/1991 SUZY Nom réel : Bae Su Ji / 배수지 / 裴秀智 Position : Vocalist / Visual / Maknae Nationalité : Coréenne Née le : 10/10/1994
723 mois0 -
10 min 40
SHINee - Show KBS Music Bank in Paris 2012.02.08 Part7
7ème partie du KBS Musik Bank in Paris qui s'est déroulé à Paris Bercy le 08 février 2012 devant pas moins de 12 000 fans venus de toute l'Europe et du monde. Performence ► SHINee : SHINee (샤이니) est un groupe de chanteurs coréen formé par SM Entertainment en 2008. Le groupe a officiellement débuté le 25 Mai 2008 à SBS Popular Songs avec le single "Replay". Le groupe est composé de Onew (le leader), Taemin, Jonghyun, Minho, et Key. Le mot "SHINee" a été trouvé par les membres et il s'agit d'une combinaison du mot anglais "shine" qui veut dire briller et de "ee" qui représente le mot "recevoir". SHINee veut donc dire "ceux qui reçoivent la lumière" ou "ceux qui sont sous les projecteurs". Ils sont habillés par un designer coréen, Ha Sang Beg. Les Membres du groupe Onew Leader de SHINee Nom réel : Lee Jin Ki (이진기) Date de naissance : 14 décembre 1989 Position : Leader / Chanteur Jonghyun Nom réel : Kim Jonghyun (김종현) Date de naissance : 08 avril 1990 Position : Leader Vocal Key Nom réel : Kim Ki Bum (김기범) Date de naissance : 23 Septembre 1991 Position : Chanteur / Rappeur Minho Nom réel : Choi Minho (최민호) Date de naissance : 09 décembre 1991 Position : Chanteur /Rappeur Taemin Nom réel : Lee TaeMin (이태민) Date de naissance : 18 juillet 1993 Position : Chorégraphe / Chanteur
1463 mois0 -
9 min 44
4Minute - Show KBS Music Bank in Paris 2012.02.08 Part5
5ème partie du KBS Musik Bank in Paris qui s'est déroulé à Paris Bercy le 08 février 2012 devant pas moins de 12 000 fans venus de toute l'Europe et du monde. Performence ► 4Minute : La formation du groupe 4minute a été annoncée en mai 2009 par Cube Entertainment (Dirigé par la soeur de JYP), avec le nom de deux des membres, Kim HyunA qui a fait partie des Wonder Girls en étant la rappeuse du groupe et Nam JiHyun.Le 11 Juin 2009, la silhouette teaser vidéo a été publiée en ligne, avec leur site officiel.L'identité des trois autres membres a été gardée secrète jusqu'au 12 juin. Leur première chanson est sortie le 15 juin avec un autre teaser vidéo, et les profils pour chaque membre du groupe ont été révélés. PROFILS DES MEMBRES DU GROUPE Ji Hyun (지현) Nom de naissance : Nam Ji Hyeon Nom de scène : Ji Hyun Position : Leader, Vocal Date de naissance : 9 Janvier 1990 (20 ans) Ga Yoon (가윤) Nom de naissance : Heo Ga Yun Nom de scène : Ga Yoon Position : Leader vocal Date de naissance : 18 Mai 1990 (1990-05-18) (19 ans) Ji Yoon (지윤) Nom de naissance : Jeon Ji Yun Nom de scène : Ji Yoon (L) Position : Lead vocal/ Rap Date de naissance : 15 Octobre 1990 (19 ans) Hyun A (현아) Nom de naissance : Kim Hyeon A Nom de scène : Hyun A Date de naissance : 6 Juin 1992 (17 ans) Position : Rap Autre information : Ancienne membre des Wonder Girls qu'elle a quitté à cause de problèmes de santé. So Hyun (소현) Nom de naissance : Kwon So Hyeon Nom de scène : So Hyun Position : Vocal Date de naissance : 30 août 1994 (15 ans) La pochette du premier mini-album des 4Minute a suscité beaucoup de discussions de la part des internautes coréens. En effet, les fans du groupe et les intéressés sont excités à la vue du nouveau style qu'affiche les 4Minute sur la pochette du mini, mais aussi excités par le fait de voir la "beauté naturelle" (je cite) qu'est Ji Yoon sans ses lunettes qui lui cachaient le visage. Ils sont en effet très surpris de voir Ji Yoon avec un look plus féminin que pendant leurs débuts. La maison de disque du groupe, Cube Entertainement avait décidé de surfer sur la vague du moment et d'avancer la sortie du mini-album au 20 Août et le début des activités promotionnelles pour "FOR MUZIK" dont la sortie était initialement prévue pour le 24 Août prochain, mais la date de sortie a souvent changer, et il est finalement sortit le 31 août 2009. Le 19 Mai 2010, les 4MINUTE revienne avec leur nouveau mini-album pour lequel elles arborent un nouveau style, et auquel auront participé les BEAST, il s'intitule Hit Your Heart et comprend 7 pistes inédites....
1633 mois0
Vidéos suggérées
Découvrez aussi
Accueil Résultats de recherche : lead
- WAT.tv recommande
- Le top WAT.tv du 3 juin
- Qui sommes nous
- Voir les nouveautés sur le blog WAT.tv
- A propos
- Nous contacter
- Conditions d'utilisation
- Conditions d'utilisation Podcast
- Politique de confidentialité
- Partenaires
- Contact pub
- Aide
- Mentions légales
- Copyright Agent